International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2015
Threshold for endometrial sampling among postmenopausal patients without vaginal bleeding.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Louie Michelle, Canavan Timothy P, Mansuria Suketu
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To provide an optimum threshold for endometrial biopsy sampling among postmenopausal women without vaginal bleeding and an incidentally-found endometrial lining of above 4mm.
METHODS: A cohort of postmenopausal women (aged ≥50 years) who underwent pelvic ultrasonography at a tertiary US hospital for indications other than vaginal bleeding was retrospectively evaluated. Women were included if they had an endometrial lining of above 4mm. Logistic regression was performed to determine the probability of endometrial carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia at each increasing millimeter of endometrial thickness from 4 to 20mm.
RESULTS: Among 462 women, carcinoma was identified in 9 (1.9%) and atypical hyperplasia in 7 (1.5%). An endometrial thickness of or above 14 mm was significantly associated with atypical hyperplasia (odds ratio 4.29; 95% confidence interval 1.30-14.20; P=0.02), with a negative predictive value of 98.3%. A thickness of or above 15 mm was associated with carcinoma (odds ratio 4.53; 95% confidence interval 1.20-17.20; P=0.03), with a negative predictive value of 98.5% and a 0.06% risk of cancer.
CONCLUSION: Irrespective of conventional risk factors, an incidentally-found thickened endometrial lining of less than 15 mm might not warrant endometrial biopsy sampling among postmenopausal women without vaginal bleeding.
METHODS: A cohort of postmenopausal women (aged ≥50 years) who underwent pelvic ultrasonography at a tertiary US hospital for indications other than vaginal bleeding was retrospectively evaluated. Women were included if they had an endometrial lining of above 4mm. Logistic regression was performed to determine the probability of endometrial carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia at each increasing millimeter of endometrial thickness from 4 to 20mm.
RESULTS: Among 462 women, carcinoma was identified in 9 (1.9%) and atypical hyperplasia in 7 (1.5%). An endometrial thickness of or above 14 mm was significantly associated with atypical hyperplasia (odds ratio 4.29; 95% confidence interval 1.30-14.20; P=0.02), with a negative predictive value of 98.3%. A thickness of or above 15 mm was associated with carcinoma (odds ratio 4.53; 95% confidence interval 1.20-17.20; P=0.03), with a negative predictive value of 98.5% and a 0.06% risk of cancer.
CONCLUSION: Irrespective of conventional risk factors, an incidentally-found thickened endometrial lining of less than 15 mm might not warrant endometrial biopsy sampling among postmenopausal women without vaginal bleeding.