Obstetrics and gynecology · 2015
Association of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Morcellation Warning With Rates of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy and Myomectomy.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Barron Kenneth I, Richard Tere, Robinson Patricia S, Lamvu Georgine
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether there was a change in surgical practice immediately after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warning statement discouraging the use of power morcellation in the surgical treatment of uterine leiomyomas.
METHODS: We performed a time-series analysis. Surgical case logs from the Florida Hospital operating room documentation system were used to retrospectively identify patients who underwent a hysterectomy or myomectomy between August 1, 2013, and December 31, 2014. Cases performed during the 8 months before the FDA announcement on April 17, 2014, were compared with cases performed during the 8 months after the FDA announcement. Six hospitals and 98 surgeons were included. We compared the proportion of minimally invasive surgery cases (vaginal, laparoscopic, or robotic-assisted) for each study period.
RESULTS: There was a 5.8% decrease in minimally invasive hysterectomies after the FDA warning statement (85.7% [1,451/1,694] compared with 79.9% [1,350/1,690]; P<.001) and an 8.7% decrease when oncologist cases were excluded (90.2% [985/1,092] compared with 81.5% [834/1,023]; P<.001). There was a 19% decrease in minimally invasive myomectomies (62.7% [64/102] compared with 43.7% [38/87]; P=.009). Analysis by subspecialty showed a significant decrease in minimally invasive hysterectomies by obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns) and minimally invasive gynecologic specialists but not urogynecologists or oncologists and a significant decrease in minimally invasive myomectomies by reproductive endocrinologists and minimally invasive gynecologic specialists but not ob-gyns.
CONCLUSION: There was a significant decrease in the proportion of minimally invasive hysterectomies and myomectomies performed during the 8 months after the FDA warning statement on the use of power morcellation.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
METHODS: We performed a time-series analysis. Surgical case logs from the Florida Hospital operating room documentation system were used to retrospectively identify patients who underwent a hysterectomy or myomectomy between August 1, 2013, and December 31, 2014. Cases performed during the 8 months before the FDA announcement on April 17, 2014, were compared with cases performed during the 8 months after the FDA announcement. Six hospitals and 98 surgeons were included. We compared the proportion of minimally invasive surgery cases (vaginal, laparoscopic, or robotic-assisted) for each study period.
RESULTS: There was a 5.8% decrease in minimally invasive hysterectomies after the FDA warning statement (85.7% [1,451/1,694] compared with 79.9% [1,350/1,690]; P<.001) and an 8.7% decrease when oncologist cases were excluded (90.2% [985/1,092] compared with 81.5% [834/1,023]; P<.001). There was a 19% decrease in minimally invasive myomectomies (62.7% [64/102] compared with 43.7% [38/87]; P=.009). Analysis by subspecialty showed a significant decrease in minimally invasive hysterectomies by obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns) and minimally invasive gynecologic specialists but not urogynecologists or oncologists and a significant decrease in minimally invasive myomectomies by reproductive endocrinologists and minimally invasive gynecologic specialists but not ob-gyns.
CONCLUSION: There was a significant decrease in the proportion of minimally invasive hysterectomies and myomectomies performed during the 8 months after the FDA warning statement on the use of power morcellation.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.