MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5858/arpa.2015-0004-cp

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2015

Trends in Cervical Cytology Screening and Reporting Practices: Results From the College of American Pathologists 2011 PAP Education Supplemental Questionnaire.

Crothers Barbara A, Darragh Teresa M, Tambouret Rosemary H, Nayar Ritu, Barkan Guliz A, Zhao Chengquan, Booth Christine Noga, Padmanabhan Vijayalakshmi, Tabatabai Z Laura, Souers Rhona J, Thomas Nicole, Wilbur David C, Moriarty Ann T

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

CONTEXT: The College of American Pathologists periodically surveys laboratories to determine changes in cytopathology practices. We report the results of a 2011 gynecologic cytology survey.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a cross-sectional survey of gynecologic cytology practices in 2010.

DESIGN

In 2011, a survey was sent to 1604 laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists gynecologic cytology interlaboratory comparison education program and proficiency testing programs requesting data from 2010 on the following topics: terminology/reporting, cytotechnologist workload, quality assurance, reagents, and ancillary testing.

RESULTS

Six hundred and twenty-five laboratories (39%) replied to the survey. The nonstandard use of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" is used by most laboratories to report the presence of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion with possibility of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Most laboratories also report the presence or absence of cells from the transformation zone. Most respondents do not limit cytotechnologist screening workload during the work shift. Only about one-third of laboratories (188 of 582; 32%) use image-assisted screening devices. Rapid prescreening as a quality assurance measure is used by only 3.5% (21 of 594) of the laboratories. When used for screening, most laboratories use the imager for retrospective review of slides to detect human locator and interpretive errors. Most laboratories receive both liquid-based cytology samples (mainly ThinPrep, Hologic, Marlborough, Massachusetts) and conventional Papanicolaou tests. Expiration dates of liquid-based cytology test vials are not usually recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of gynecologic cytology is evolving rapidly. These survey results offer a snapshot of national gynecologic cytology practices in 2010.

Для цитирования: Crothers Barbara A, Darragh Teresa M, Tambouret Rosemary H, Nayar Ritu, Barkan Guliz A, Zhao Chengquan, Booth Christine Noga, Padmanabhan Vijayalakshmi, Tabatabai Z Laura, Souers Rhona J, Thomas Nicole, Wilbur David C, Moriarty Ann T. Trends in Cervical Cytology Screening and Reporting Practices: Results From the College of American Pathologists 2011 PAP Education Supplemental Questionnaire.. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2015. DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2015-0004-cp.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.