Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2008
Prognostic significance of tumor iNOS and COX-2 in stage III malignant cutaneous melanoma.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Johansson C Christian, Egyházi Suzanne, Masucci Giuseppe, Harlin Helena, Mougiakakos Dimitrios, Poschke Isabel, Nilsson Bo, Garberg Liss, Tuominen Rainer, Linden Diana, Stolt Marianne Frostvik, Hansson Johan, Kiessling Rolf
Аннотация
PURPOSE: New prognostic markers are needed for malignant melanoma. Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase type 2 (COX-2) have been described to correlate with progression of melanoma. Moreover, activating mutations in BRAF/NRAS oncogenes are often detected in melanoma. The BRAF/NRAS mutation status and expression of COX-2 and iNOS were examined to compare their prognostic value for overall survival (OS) in stage III malignant cutaneous melanoma.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The expression of iNOS and COX-2 in metastatic lymph nodes from 21 rapidly progressing (OS from date of diagnosis of stage III disease < or =14 months) and 17 slowly progressing (OS > or =60 months) stage III cutaneous melanoma patients was examined by immunohistochemistry. The presence of BRAF/NRAS mutations was analyzed using direct DNA sequencing. Chi2 exact trend test and logistic regression analysis were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Both iNOS (P = 0.002) and COX-2 (P = 0.048) alone significantly predicted OS. The BRAF/NRAS mutation status did not significantly differ between patient groups, although iNOS significantly (P = 0.013) correlated with BRAF mutation frequency. Furthermore, the odds ratio (OR) with respect to OS of iNOS (OR = 10.4) was higher than that of COX-2 (OR = 5.6) and was stable in the multivariate analysis of OS together with disease stage IIIB/C, ulceration, number of metastatic lymph nodes, and Breslow tumor thickness.
CONCLUSION: Our data show that iNOS is an independent and stronger prognostic factor for OS in stage III malignant cutaneous melanoma than COX-2.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The expression of iNOS and COX-2 in metastatic lymph nodes from 21 rapidly progressing (OS from date of diagnosis of stage III disease < or =14 months) and 17 slowly progressing (OS > or =60 months) stage III cutaneous melanoma patients was examined by immunohistochemistry. The presence of BRAF/NRAS mutations was analyzed using direct DNA sequencing. Chi2 exact trend test and logistic regression analysis were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Both iNOS (P = 0.002) and COX-2 (P = 0.048) alone significantly predicted OS. The BRAF/NRAS mutation status did not significantly differ between patient groups, although iNOS significantly (P = 0.013) correlated with BRAF mutation frequency. Furthermore, the odds ratio (OR) with respect to OS of iNOS (OR = 10.4) was higher than that of COX-2 (OR = 5.6) and was stable in the multivariate analysis of OS together with disease stage IIIB/C, ulceration, number of metastatic lymph nodes, and Breslow tumor thickness.
CONCLUSION: Our data show that iNOS is an independent and stronger prognostic factor for OS in stage III malignant cutaneous melanoma than COX-2.