The American Journal of dermatopathology · 2008
Immunohistochemical expression of survivin in cutaneous sebaceous lesions.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Calder Kenneth B, Khalil Farah K, Schlauder Scott, Cualing H D, Morgan Michael B
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Survivin is a member of the inhibitor of apoptosis family of proteins implicated in the inhibition of apoptosis and cell cycle control, both crucial in the progression to malignancy. Survivin overexpression has been demonstrated in numerous malignancies including cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma. To date, there are no studies evaluating the expression of survivin in sebaceous neoplasms.
METHODS: Immunohistochemical expression of survivin was evaluated in a total of 20 extraocular sebaceous neoplasms: sebaceous hyperplasia (SH, 8), sebaceous adenoma (SA, 8), and sebaceous carcinoma (SC, 4). All the results were independently evaluated by a single dermatopathologist.
RESULTS: Nuclear expression of survivin was present in 1.4% of lesional SH cells, 8.2% of SA cells, and 12.5% of SC cells. A significant difference in survivin expression with the Student t test was noted between SH and SA (P=0.01), SA and SC (P=0.05), and SH and SC (P=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: There is a statistically significant difference in survivin expression among SH, SA, and SC. These findings demonstrate the potential diagnostic utility of survivin, further assisting in the microscopic differentiation of benign and malignant sebaceous neoplasms. However, larger studies are needed to determine the significance of survivin expression as it relates to recurrence, metastatic potential, and outcome.
METHODS: Immunohistochemical expression of survivin was evaluated in a total of 20 extraocular sebaceous neoplasms: sebaceous hyperplasia (SH, 8), sebaceous adenoma (SA, 8), and sebaceous carcinoma (SC, 4). All the results were independently evaluated by a single dermatopathologist.
RESULTS: Nuclear expression of survivin was present in 1.4% of lesional SH cells, 8.2% of SA cells, and 12.5% of SC cells. A significant difference in survivin expression with the Student t test was noted between SH and SA (P=0.01), SA and SC (P=0.05), and SH and SC (P=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: There is a statistically significant difference in survivin expression among SH, SA, and SC. These findings demonstrate the potential diagnostic utility of survivin, further assisting in the microscopic differentiation of benign and malignant sebaceous neoplasms. However, larger studies are needed to determine the significance of survivin expression as it relates to recurrence, metastatic potential, and outcome.