Fertility and sterility · 1997
Does hydrosalpinx reduce the pregnancy rate after in vitro fertilization?
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wainer R, Camus E, Camier B, Martin C, Vasseur C, Merlet F
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of hydrosalpinges on the pregnancy rate in an IVF program.
DESIGN: Multicentric retrospective analysis of clinical and laboratory data.
SETTING: Two assisted reproductive technology centers in university hospitals.
PATIENT(S): Four hundred forty-three women, under 38 years of age, with pure tubal infertility. The patients were classified into the following five groups: bilateral hydrosalpinges (n = 37), unilateral hydrosalpinx (n = 54), bilateral tubal occlusion (n = 207), unilateral tubal occlusion (n = 55), and severe tubal disease without complete occlusion (n = 90).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pregnancy and implantation rates.
RESULT(S): The pregnancy and the implantation rates per transfer (12.3% and 5.4%) obtained by women with bilateral hydrosalpinges are significantly lower than the rates (means = 23.1% and 12%) for all other tubal infertility groups.
CONCLUSION(S): Bilateral hydrosalpinges have a deleterious effect on the outcome of IVF program.
DESIGN: Multicentric retrospective analysis of clinical and laboratory data.
SETTING: Two assisted reproductive technology centers in university hospitals.
PATIENT(S): Four hundred forty-three women, under 38 years of age, with pure tubal infertility. The patients were classified into the following five groups: bilateral hydrosalpinges (n = 37), unilateral hydrosalpinx (n = 54), bilateral tubal occlusion (n = 207), unilateral tubal occlusion (n = 55), and severe tubal disease without complete occlusion (n = 90).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pregnancy and implantation rates.
RESULT(S): The pregnancy and the implantation rates per transfer (12.3% and 5.4%) obtained by women with bilateral hydrosalpinges are significantly lower than the rates (means = 23.1% and 12%) for all other tubal infertility groups.
CONCLUSION(S): Bilateral hydrosalpinges have a deleterious effect on the outcome of IVF program.