The Journal of reproductive medicine · 1997
Medical treatment of interstitial pregnancy. A report of three unsuccessful cases.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Barnhart K, Spandorfer S, Coutifaris C
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Medical management of ectopic pregnancy is effective in selected cases and is recommended to treat interstitial pregnancy to avoid surgery that may limit future fertility. Although successful medical management of interstitial pregnancy has been reported, evidence does not support success rates equal to that in other ectopic locations.
CASES: Four cases of interstitial ectopic pregnancy were identified. Only one of the four was successfully treated with medical therapy. Case 1 was a confirmed, 2.5-cm interstitial pregnancy that failed a multiple-dose methotrexate protocol. Case 2 was an unrecognized interstitial pregnancy that failed single-dose therapy. Case 3 was a rupture of a medically managed interstitial pregnancy despite complete resolution of serum human chorionic gonadotropin. A literature review demonstrated an overall combined failure rate of 35% (7/20).
CONCLUSION: Compared with an isthmic or ampullary pregnancy, a disproportionate number of patients with interstitial pregnancy fail medical management and require emergency surgery. The presence of a documented interstitial pregnancy is not an absolute contraindication to medical management. Patients should be counseled that medical management of an interstitial pregnancy may not have the same rate of success as it does in other locations in the fallopian tube. Surgery in this case may be the preferred treatment option.
CASES: Four cases of interstitial ectopic pregnancy were identified. Only one of the four was successfully treated with medical therapy. Case 1 was a confirmed, 2.5-cm interstitial pregnancy that failed a multiple-dose methotrexate protocol. Case 2 was an unrecognized interstitial pregnancy that failed single-dose therapy. Case 3 was a rupture of a medically managed interstitial pregnancy despite complete resolution of serum human chorionic gonadotropin. A literature review demonstrated an overall combined failure rate of 35% (7/20).
CONCLUSION: Compared with an isthmic or ampullary pregnancy, a disproportionate number of patients with interstitial pregnancy fail medical management and require emergency surgery. The presence of a documented interstitial pregnancy is not an absolute contraindication to medical management. Patients should be counseled that medical management of an interstitial pregnancy may not have the same rate of success as it does in other locations in the fallopian tube. Surgery in this case may be the preferred treatment option.