Academic radiology · 1997
Endoscopic transvaginal approach to the rabbit uterine cervix: improvement in the technique of selective tubal catheterization.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Maubon A J, Thurmond A S, Nikolchev J, Khera A, Machan L S, Rouanet J P
Аннотация
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors compared two methods of selective fallopian tube catheterization in female rabbits.
METHODS: Technical success rates and procedure times in two groups of animals were compared. Group 1 consisted of 20 female rabbits catheterized with a fluoroscopic technique. Group 2 consisted of 55 rabbits catheterized with a combination of endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance.
RESULTS: The technique used in group 2 allowed a statistically significant reduction in the time required for cervical catheterization and the total procedural time (P < .01). There was a parallel statistically significant reduction in fluoroscopy time (P < .01). Technical success rates and adverse effects were similar for the two techniques.
CONCLUSION: The combined endoscopic-fluoroscopic technique requires a shorter time than the established fluoroscopic technique and should be considered for future selective tubal catheterization experiments in rabbits.
METHODS: Technical success rates and procedure times in two groups of animals were compared. Group 1 consisted of 20 female rabbits catheterized with a fluoroscopic technique. Group 2 consisted of 55 rabbits catheterized with a combination of endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance.
RESULTS: The technique used in group 2 allowed a statistically significant reduction in the time required for cervical catheterization and the total procedural time (P < .01). There was a parallel statistically significant reduction in fluoroscopy time (P < .01). Technical success rates and adverse effects were similar for the two techniques.
CONCLUSION: The combined endoscopic-fluoroscopic technique requires a shorter time than the established fluoroscopic technique and should be considered for future selective tubal catheterization experiments in rabbits.