MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5152/balkanmedj.2015.15886

Медицинская библиотека · Balkan medical journal · 2016

Benign Cystic Mesothelioma in a Child: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Tuncer Ahmet Ali, Narcı Adnan, Dilek Fatma Hüsniye, Embleton Didem Baskın, Çetinkurşun Salih

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Benign cystic mesothelioma (BCM) is a rare tumor with benign characteristic. There are only 8 child cases reported in the English literature. In this report, we present this rare entity a brief review of the literature.

CASE REPORT: A two year-old boy presenting with abdominal swelling was hospitalized. Physical examination revealed a mass filling the abdomen. Laboratory findings were not specific. Abdominal computerized tomography showed a 15×13×11 cm cystic mass extending from the bladder to the liver with no solid components and no infiltration to adjacent organs. Operation revealed a cystic mass filled with yellow-green serous fluid which was attached to the right lobe of the liver with a 1 cm thick peduncle. Total excision of the mass was performed by clamping and cutting the narrow attachment. Recovery was uneventful. Pathology revealed multiple cysts lined with mesothelial cells. No recurrence was seen after 5 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

BCM should be kept in mind as a rare cause of the abdominal mass in children, as it may lead to confusion in preoperative diagnosis. Although rare, patients should be followed throughout life because of the risk of recurrence and malignant degeneration.

Для цитирования: Tuncer Ahmet Ali, Narcı Adnan, Dilek Fatma Hüsniye, Embleton Didem Baskın, Çetinkurşun Salih. Benign Cystic Mesothelioma in a Child: Case Report and Review of the Literature.. Balkan medical journal. 2016. DOI: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2015.15886.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.