European radiology · 2021
[18F]FDG PET/MRI and magnetoencephalography may improve presurgical localization of temporal lobe epilepsy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guo Kun, Wang Jingjuan, Cui Bixiao, Wang Yihe, Hou Yaqin, Zhao Guoguang, Lu Jie
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical value of the combination of [18F]FDG PET/MRI and magnetoencephalography (MEG) ([18F]FDG PET/MRI/MEG) in localizing the epileptogenic zone (EZ) in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients.
METHODS: Seventy-three patients with localization-related TLE who underwent [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MEG were enrolled retrospectively. PET/MRI images were interpreted by two radiologists; the focal hypometabolism on PET was identified using statistical parametric mapping (SPM). MEG spike sources were co-registered onto T1-weighted sequence and analyzed by Neuromag software. The clinical value of [18F]FDG PET/MRI, MEG, and PET/MRI/MEG in locating the EZ was assessed using cortical resection and surgical outcomes as criteria. The correlations between surgical outcomes and modalities concordant or non-concordant with cortical resection were analyzed.
RESULTS: For 46.6% (34/73) of patients, MRI showed definitely structural abnormality concordant with surgical resection. SPM results of [18F]FDG PET showed focal temporal lobe hypometabolism concordant with surgical resection in 67.1% (49/73) of patients, while the concordant cases increased to 82.2% (60/73) patients with simultaneous MRI co-registration. MEG was concordant with surgical resection in 71.2% (52/73) of patients. The lobar localization was defined in 94.5% (69/73) of patients by the [18F]FDG PET/MRI/MEG. The results of PET/MRI/MEG concordance with surgical resection were significantly higher than that of PET/MRI or MEG (χ2 = 13.948, p < 0.001; χ2 = 5.393, p = 0.020). The results of PET/MRI/MEG cortical resection concordance with surgical outcome were shown to be better than PET/MRI or MEG (χ2 = 6.695, p = 0.012; χ2 = 16.991, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Presurgical evaluation by [18F]FDG PET/MRI/MEG could improve the identification of the EZ in TLE and may further guide surgical decision-making.
KEY POINTS: • Lobar localization was defined in 94.5% of patients by the [18F]FDG PET/MRI/MEG. • The results of PET/MRI/MEG concordance with surgical resection were significantly higher than that of PET/MRI or MEG alone. • The results of PET/MRI/MEG cortical resection concordance with surgical outcome were shown to be better than that of PET/MRI or MEG alone.
METHODS: Seventy-three patients with localization-related TLE who underwent [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MEG were enrolled retrospectively. PET/MRI images were interpreted by two radiologists; the focal hypometabolism on PET was identified using statistical parametric mapping (SPM). MEG spike sources were co-registered onto T1-weighted sequence and analyzed by Neuromag software. The clinical value of [18F]FDG PET/MRI, MEG, and PET/MRI/MEG in locating the EZ was assessed using cortical resection and surgical outcomes as criteria. The correlations between surgical outcomes and modalities concordant or non-concordant with cortical resection were analyzed.
RESULTS: For 46.6% (34/73) of patients, MRI showed definitely structural abnormality concordant with surgical resection. SPM results of [18F]FDG PET showed focal temporal lobe hypometabolism concordant with surgical resection in 67.1% (49/73) of patients, while the concordant cases increased to 82.2% (60/73) patients with simultaneous MRI co-registration. MEG was concordant with surgical resection in 71.2% (52/73) of patients. The lobar localization was defined in 94.5% (69/73) of patients by the [18F]FDG PET/MRI/MEG. The results of PET/MRI/MEG concordance with surgical resection were significantly higher than that of PET/MRI or MEG (χ2 = 13.948, p < 0.001; χ2 = 5.393, p = 0.020). The results of PET/MRI/MEG cortical resection concordance with surgical outcome were shown to be better than PET/MRI or MEG (χ2 = 6.695, p = 0.012; χ2 = 16.991, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Presurgical evaluation by [18F]FDG PET/MRI/MEG could improve the identification of the EZ in TLE and may further guide surgical decision-making.
KEY POINTS: • Lobar localization was defined in 94.5% of patients by the [18F]FDG PET/MRI/MEG. • The results of PET/MRI/MEG concordance with surgical resection were significantly higher than that of PET/MRI or MEG alone. • The results of PET/MRI/MEG cortical resection concordance with surgical outcome were shown to be better than that of PET/MRI or MEG alone.