MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.044

Медицинская библиотека · NeuroImage · 2016

Similar coding of freely chosen and externally cued intentions in a fronto-parietal network.

Wisniewski David, Goschke Thomas, Haynes John-Dylan

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Intentional action is essential to human behavior, yet its neural basis remains poorly understood. In order to identify neural networks specifically involved in intentional action, freely chosen and externally cued intentions have previously been contrasted. This has led to the identification of a fronto-parietal network, which is involved in freely choosing one's intentions. However, it remains unclear whether this network encodes specific intentions, or whether it merely reflects general preparatory or control processes correlated with intentional action. Here, we used MVPA on fMRI data to identify brain regions encoding non-motor intentions that were either freely chosen or externally cued. We found that a fronto-parietal network, including the lateral prefrontal cortex, premotor, and parietal cortex, contained information about both freely chosen and externally cued intentions. Importantly, MVPA cross-classification indicated that this network represents the content of our intentions similarly, regardless of whether these intentions are freely chosen or externally cued. This finding suggests that the intention network has a general role in processing and representing intentions independent of their origin.

Для цитирования: Wisniewski David, Goschke Thomas, Haynes John-Dylan. Similar coding of freely chosen and externally cued intentions in a fronto-parietal network.. NeuroImage. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.044.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.