Текущая стратификация и установка множественных миелом и связанные с этим нарушения клональной плазменной клетки.

Introduction

Clonal plasma cell disorders encompass a broad and biologically diverse group of plasma cell and lymphoplasmacytic neoplasms, including multiple myeloma (MM), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), and immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis. Despite sharing a common feature of clonal immunoglobulin production, these disorders differ markedly in their pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and prognosis. With the improving biologic insight into these disorders and the evolving treatment paradigms, there is an increasing need for accurate and individualized risk stratification to guide decision-making in patients with these malignancies. In this review, we examine current risk stratification approaches across the spectrum of clonal plasma cell disorders, evaluating their clinical utility, limitations, and areas for future refinement.

Multiple myeloma

MM accounts for approximately 10% of all newly diagnosed hematologic malignancies, with over 36,000 new cases and more than 12,000 MM-related deaths annually in the United States [ 1 ]. Over the past two decades, the treatment landscape has expanded significantly, resulting in marked improvements in patient outcomes. The five-year overall survival (OS) rate has increased from 32% in the 1990s to over 60% in the past decade, and more than half of the patients without high-risk disease now have an estimated OS of more than 10 years [ 1 , 2 ]. The incorporation of quadruplet induction regimens and the use of immune effector therapies in the relapsed setting are expected to further enhance these outcomes. However, a subset of patients with high-risk disease continues to experience suboptimal outcomes, with OS ranging from only 3–5 years—even with access to novel and immune-based therapies [ 3 ]. There remains a critical need for precise identification of high-risk patients and the implementation of tailored therapeutic strategies. Over the years, various prognostic models and risk stratification systems have been developed for patients with active MM. The Durie-Salmon staging system, introduced in 1975, classified patients based primarily on disease burden and represents a true staging system [ 4 ]. In 2005, the International Staging System (ISS) provided a prognostic risk-stratification system incorporating serum albumin and beta-2 microglobulin levels to classify patients into three risk categories [ 5 ]. While effective in an era of modest treatment responses, these systems were limited in capturing the underlying biologic heterogeneity of the disease. The discovery of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs)—specifically del(17p), t(4;14), and t(14;16)—through interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) prompted a shift toward cytogenetics-based risk stratification [ 6 ]. In 2014, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) defined high-risk MM as International Staging System (ISS) stage II/III disease with the presence of del(17p) or t(4;14), identifying a group with a median OS of two years [ 7 ]. The Revised ISS (R-ISS) combined cytogenetic data with elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and ISS stage to define high-risk disease, which accounted for 23% of patients and had a median OS of 3.6 years [ 8 ]. The second revision (R2-ISS) further refined the prognostic weighting of cytogenetic features, incorporating 1q21 gain/amplification (1q21+) and excluding t(14;16), identifying a high-risk cohort with a median OS of 3.3 years [ 9 ]. Additionally, the Mayo Additive Staging System (MASS), a simplified model including elevated LDH and HRCAs, identified 31% of patients as high-risk, with a median OS of 4.3 years [ 10 ]. A summary of the commonly used risk stratification schema for active MM is provided in Supplementary Table 1 .

Our understanding of the prognostic impact of additional genomic abnormalities continues to evolve. A markedly inferior prognosis has been noted with the presence of biallelic del(1p32) (likely due to CDKN2C deletions) and TP53 mutations/inactivation [ 11 , 12 ]. Similarly, there is heterogeneity in outcomes for patients with established adverse prognostic markers like 1q21+, driven in part by the associated large scale genomic events like chromothripsis/templated insertions, the presence of additional high-risk CGAs and the number of extra copies of 1q [ 13 – 15 ]. In patients harboring t(4;14), the location of the breakpoint of NSD2 can determine prognosis and the presence of a ‘late-disruption’ (within the NSD2 gene) associated with worse outcomes [ 16 ]. The MAF translocations, t(14;16) and t(14;20), are present in 1–3% of patients with newly diagnosed MM and enriched in APOBEC mutational signatures [ 17 , 18 ]. The MAF/MAFB translocations are frequently associated with 1q21+ and del(17p), and it is likely the combined presence of MAF/MAFB translocations with secondary HRCAs that drives the adverse prognosis [ 19 ]. Majority of the patients included in the previously discussed risk stratification models were treated with what would be considered suboptimal therapy in the current era. The inclusion of a large number of variables, especially gain 1q, moved more than 50% of MM into the high-risk category, which limited the clinical meaningfulness of risk stratification.

In response, the International Myeloma Society (IMS) and IMWG have introduced a new risk stratification framework in 2024 (Table 1 ) [ 20 ]. This classification defines high-risk MM as the presence of del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation and biallelic del(1p32) by themselves. The presence of an elevated beta-2 microglobulin (>5.5 mg/L) in the setting of a normal serum creatinine (<1.2 mg/dL) is associated with inferior survival and an independent high-risk feature in the new IMS/IMWG classification [ 20 ]. Additionally, patients harboring two or more intermediate-risk abnormalities—1q21+ (gain or amplification), t(4;14), t(14;16), monoallelic del(1p32)—are also classified as high-risk [ 20 ]. Using this new schema, approximately 20% of patients were identified as high-risk. We recommend adopting this new IMS/IMWG definition for consistent and robust risk stratification in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Using a uniform risk-stratification schema will allow for harmonization of efforts in conducting clinical trials focused on high-risk MM. As we move into an era of risk-adapted therapy, further refinement to these schemas is expected by incorporation of tumor-specific factors like presence of circulating tumor cells and extramedullary disease, high-risk gene expression profiles, host specific factors like frailty and immune fitness, and response parameters like measurable residual disease (Fig. 1 ) [ 21 – 30 ]. Fig. 1 Risk stratification in multiple myeloma. An evolving paradigm of risk stratification for multiple myeloma involves comprehensive tumor genomics evaluation, consideration for disease burden and location, and various host factors that can determine access and response to existing treatments (Created using Biorender ® ). ISS international staging system, IMWG International Myeloma Working Group, FISH fluorescence in situ hybridization, MRD measurable residual disease, PCL plasma cell leukemia. Table 1 The International Myeloma Society (IMS)/International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Definition for High-risk Multiple Myeloma. Presence of any one of the following: • Del(17p) a and/or TP53 mutation b • Biallelic del(1p32) • t(4;14), t(14;16) or t(14;20) Co-Occuring with 1q21+ c or monoallelic del(1p32) • Monoallelic del(1p32) Co-occuring with 1q21+ c • Elevated beta-2 microglobulin (>5.5 mg/dL) with normal renal function (creatinine <1.2 mg/dL) Mayo Supplemental Criteria for High-Risk Multiple Myeloma • Primary plasma cell leukemia • Newly diagnosed myeloma with extramedullary disease • High Plasma Cell S-phase Fraction (≥2%) Mayo Supplemental Criteria for Double-Hit Multiple Myeloma • Two or more of the 4 IMS/IMWG high risk qualifying abnormalities listed above with the exception of elevated beta-2 microglobulin a At least a 20% cancer clonal fraction in CD138-sorted plasma cells. b Assessed by a next generation dequencing-based method. c gain (3 copies) or amplification (4 or more copies) of chromosome 1q.

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

Multiple myeloma consistently develops from the premalignant precursor condition, termed MGUS [ 31 ]. MGUS is defined by the presence of a circulating monoclonal (M) protein <3 g/dL, clonal bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs) < 10%, and no evidence of end-organ damage attributable to the plasma cell disorder [ 32 ]. While MGUS is relatively common in the general population, affecting 3–6% of adults over the age of 50, only a small proportion of individuals with MGUS will ever develop clinical consequences [ 33 , 34 ]. The annual risk of progression from MGUS to MM or related malignancies requiring treatment is approximately 1% per year [ 35 ]. However, there is substantial heterogeneity in progression risk among patients with MGUS. In a Mayo Clinic study of 1384 patients with MGUS, the presence of three of the following risk factors—an abnormal serum free light chain (sFLC) ratio, an M-protein concentration ≥1.5 g/dL, or a non-IgG isotype—was associated with a 58% risk of progression to MM over 20 years [ 36 ]. In contrast, patients without any of these risk features had only a 5% risk of progression over the same period. This risk stratification model, subsequently adopted by the IMWG, is recommended for evaluating patients with MGUS at initial diagnosis (Table 2 ) [ 37 ]. Notably, longitudinal application of the IMWG model at follow-up continues to demonstrate robust prognostic value [ 38 ]. Presence of immunoparesis (characterized by suppression of 2 or more uninvolved immunoglobulins) and a high fraction of clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow are other important risk factors associated with an early progression of MGUS [ 39 – 41 ]. Table 2 Risk stratification of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). IMWG Risk Category Relative Risk of Progression Absolute Risk of Progression at 20 years (%) Absolute Risk of Progression at 20 years, accounting for death as a competing risk (%) Low risk • M-protein <1.5 g/dL • normal sFLCR (0.26-1.65) • IgG isotype 1 5 2 Low-intermediate risk (any 1 factor being abnormal) 5.4 21 10 High-Intermediate Risk (any 2 factors abnormal) 10.1 37 18 High-risk (all three factors abnormal) 20.8 58 27 IMWG international myeloma working group, sFLCR serum free light chain ratio [ 36 ]. © the American Society of Hematology.

Risk stratification in MGUS plays a critical role in guiding baseline evaluation and surveillance strategies. For example, in low-risk MGUS, the probability of identifying ≥10% BMPCs or skeletal lesions at baseline is typically <5%, making extensive diagnostic workup potentially unnecessary [ 42 ]. Similarly, after demonstrating clinical stability over the first 6–12 months, follow-up for low-risk MGUS can be performed at less frequent intervals. The iStopMM study has further refined the predictive capacity of the IMWG model by incorporating serum immunoglobulin levels alongside the original three variables to better predict BMPC infiltration [ 43 ].

Smoldering multiple myeloma

SMM is defined by the presence of ≥3 g/dL of serum monoclonal protein and/or at least 10% clonal BMPCs with the absence of myeloma defining events [ 31 ]. Unlike MGUS, the risk of progression of SMM to active MM is significantly higher at around 10% per year for the first 5 years after diagnosis [ 44 ]. Till recently, the exact prevalence of SMM was unclear as routine bone marrow aspirates were not performed for patients with MGUS. The previous estimates of 0.44 cases per 100,000 individuals from the Swedish Cancer Registry likely underestimate its prevalence, given this was lower than the estimated MM rate [ 41 ]. The iStopMM study screened 75,422 individuals (51% of all individuals above the age of 40 in Iceland) and identified SMM in 0.53% of the eligible screened population [ 45 ].

Within SMM, it is critical to identify patients with a high risk of progression who can benefit from early intervention and enrollment in clinical trials. Various risk stratification models have been utilized to determine the risk of progression in SMM. The Spanish model, using ≥95% aberrant plasma cell phenotype on flow cytometry and reduction in uninvolved immunoglobulin (score of 1 for each), identified a cohort of high-risk SMM (score of 2) with a median time-to-progression (TTP) of 23 months [ 46 ]. Subsequently, the Mayo 20/2/20 risk-stratification including 421 patients with SMM that were stratified into three risk groups based on their BMPCs (>20%), serum M-protein (>2 g/dL), and sFLC ratio (>20), Table 3 [ 47 ]. The median TTP for high-risk SMM, as defined by the 20/2/20 criteria, was 29 months. This was validated in a large international cohort, which reported a 2-year progression risk of 44% for patients with 2 or more risk factors based on the Mayo 20/2/20 criteria [ 48 ]. Biologically most patients with low and intermediate risk SMM, and almost all patients with high-risk SMM have malignancy signatures identical to that seen in MM. Table 3 The Mayo 20/2/20 risk stratification schema for smoldering multiple myeloma. Risk Category Time-to-Progression (median, months) Estimated Rate of Progression at 2 years from Diagnosis, % Relative Risk of Progression at 2 years from Diagnosis Low Risk None of the following: BMPCs >20% M spike >2 g/dL sFLC ratio >20 110 9.7 1 (reference) Intermediate Risk: Presence of 1 of the three risk factors 68 26.3 2.71 High-risk: presence of two or three risk factors 29 47.4 4.89 Adapted from ref. [ 47 ].

Further refinement of the Mayo 20/2/20 risk-stratification model can be accomplished if cytogenetic results are available. The IMWG assessed the impact of FISH data, with t(4;14), t(14;16), +1q, and del(13q) noted to be associated with a shorter TTP. Incorporating this FISH data into the Mayo model, a subset of patients with three or more risk factors demonstrated a 2-year progression risk of 63% [ 48 ]. The application of the 20/2/20 model at subsequent time points in follow-up has also demonstrated clinical utility [ 49 ]. Similarly, evolving patterns of serum monoclonal protein during follow-up evaluations may further enhance risk stratification in SMM [ 50 ]. As we move closer to exploring treatment strategies for high-risk SMM, having a robust risk-stratification tool is essential [ 51 ]. We recommend the 20/2/20 risk stratification schema as a reliable framework for assessing progression risk in SMM given its simplicity and reproducibility.

Waldenström macroglobulinemia

WM is an IgM-secreting lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) that arises from activated B-cells [ 52 ]. Each year, ~1500 individuals are diagnosed with WM in the United States, with an age-adjusted incidence rate of 0.42 per 100,000 person-years [ 53 ]. About 20% of patients have a preceding diagnosis of smoldering WM (SWM) before progressing to active or symptomatic disease [ 54 ]. Smoldering WM is defined by ≥10% bone marrow infiltration by LPL and/or an M-protein level ≥3 g/dL in the absence of WM-related symptoms requiring treatment. These symptoms include hemoglobin ≤10 g/dL, platelet count ≤100 × 10 9 /L, significant fatigue, B symptoms, symptomatic organomegaly, hyperviscosity, cryoglobulinemia, histologic transformation, ALH amyloidosis, renal insufficiency, and clinically significant sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy attributable to WM [ 55 , 56 ]. Multiple risk factors and risk stratification systems have been developed over the years in WM. In a cohort of 489 patients with asymptomatic WM and IgM MGUS, the following were identified as independent risk factors for progression: serum IgM ≥4500 mg/dL, bone marrow LPL infiltration ≥70%, serum beta-2 microglobulin ≥4 mg/dL, and serum albumin <3.5 g/dL [ 57 ]. These variables were incorporated as continuous factors in a proportional hazards model and stratified into quartiles. The median time to progression (TTP) was 1.8 years for the high-risk group (above the third quartile), 4.8 years for the intermediate-risk group (interquartile range), and 9.3 years for the low-risk group (below the first quartile) [ 57 ]. Notably, this model did not incorporate MYD88 L265P and CXCR4 mutation status due to insufficient data available at that time. The MYD88 WT genotype is associated with a significantly shorter TTP to active WM (median TTP: 1.8 years; hazard ratio: 2.7) [ 57 ]. Similarly, patients with CXCR4 mutations experienced a shorter TTP (median 51 months vs. not reached in CXCR4 WT ) [ 58 ]. Importantly, patients with SWM have an overall survival (OS) comparable to the general population, and even those with high-risk SWM should not initiate therapy unless treatment criteria are met [ 54 ].

Among patients with active WM, the median OS approaches a decade, although outcomes are heterogeneous [ 59 ]. The International Prognostic Scoring System for WM (IPSS-WM) stratifies patients into three risk categories based on five factors: age, platelet count, hemoglobin level, beta-2 microglobulin, and IgM level. The high-risk group demonstrated a 5-year OS of 36% [ 60 ]. However, the IPSS-WM was developed in a cohort of patients treated before 2001 and did not interrogate the prognostic impact of the MYD88 L265P mutation, which was discovered subsequently in WM. More recently, the Modified Staging System for WM (MSS-WM) has been proposed, stratifying patients into four risk groups based on age, serum LDH, and serum albumin. In the derivation cohort, the 5-year OS ranged from 55% in the highest-risk group to 93% in the lowest (Table 4 ). These findings were replicated in an external validation cohort, wherein the 5-year OS was 57% for the highest risk group and 93% for the lowest risk group. The MSS-WM maintained prognostic significance even when accounting for non-WM-related mortality as a competing risk and performed better than the IPSS-WM [ 61 ]. The MYD88 L265P was not identified to be prognostic in the derivation or validation cohorts in MSS-WM [ 61 ]. Incorporating elevated beta-2 microglobulin (≥4 mg/dL) into high-risk MSS-WM may identify an ultra-high risk cohort with a median OS of 2.5 years [ 61 ]. Given its simplicity, external validation, and relevance in the modern treatment landscape, we recommend using the MSS-WM for risk stratification in active WM. It is worth noting that most patients in the MSS-WM cohorts received frontline chemoimmunotherapy, the current standard of care. Future efforts should aim to validate the MSS-WM in cohorts treated with frontline BTK inhibitors and evaluate the prognostic utility of CXCR4 mutational status. Table 4 Risk Stratification for Active/Symptomatic WM using the Modified Staging System for Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (MSS-WM). Risk Category Proportion of patients in each stratum, % Estimated median overall survival (OS), years 5-year OS in the derivation cohort, % Score Assignment− Serum albumin <3.5 g/dL: 1 point Age 66–75 years: 1 point Age >75 years: 2 points Serum LDH > ULN: 2 points Low Risk (Score 0) 21 14.6 93 Low-Intermediate Risk (Score 1) 32 11.2 82 Intermediate Risk (Score 2) 24 8.3 69 High Risk (Score ≥3) 23 5.5 55 Adapted from ref. [ 61 ]. LDH lactate dehydrogenase, ULN upper limit of normal.

AL Amyloidosis

AL amyloidosis is characterized by the excess production of immunoglobulin light chains (or rarely heavy chains) secondary to a clonal plasma cell disorder, that are deposited as misfolded proteins in various organs resulting in the consequent damage [ 62 ]. In a Mayo Clinic study analyzing individuals residing in Olmsted County between 1900 and 2015, the incidence of AL amyloidosis was found to be 1.2 per 100,000 person-years, with an estimated 2200–3500 new cases diagnosed annually in the United States [ 63 , 64 ]. Globally, the incidence is estimated at 3 to 12 cases per million person-years [ 65 ].

Prognosis in AL amyloidosis is heavily influenced by the extent of organ involvement, with cardiac involvement consistently associated with poorer outcomes. Multiple staging systems have been developed over time to help stratify risk (Table 5 ). The Mayo Clinic 2004 staging system, based on troponin T (>0.035 ng/mL) and NT-proBNP (>332 pg/mL), stratified patients into three risk groups, and those in the high-risk category had a median overall survival (OS) of 3.5 to 4 months [ 66 ]. In 2013, a European modification of the Mayo 2004 system identified an ultra-high-risk cohort (Stage IIIB), defined by troponin T > 0.035 ng/mL and NT-proBNP >8500 pg/mL or systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg. This group had a median OS of 3 months, with a hazard ratio (HR) for mortality of 11.1 compared to Stage I patients with normal cardiac biomarkers [ 67 ]. The Mayo Clinic 2012 staging system incorporated the difference in free light chains as an additional prognostic marker, alongside the established cardiac biomarkers. This model stratified patients into four risk groups with more balanced distribution. The median OS for Stage IV patients was 5.8 months, with a hazard ratio for death of 6.3 compared to Stage I [ 68 ]. Comparatively, the Mayo 2012 system provides better prediction of long-term survival, while the Mayo 2004 system with the European modification offers more accurate identification of patients at risk of early mortality [ 62 , 69 ]. For this reason, we recommend using both the Mayo 2012 model and the modified Mayo 2004 model for baseline risk assessment. With the advent of high-sensitivity troponin-T, revised cutoffs have been proposed and validated. Conversions for these are described elsewhere [ 70 ]. A BNP and cardiac troponin-I-based risk stratification model has also been proposed by the Boston University investigators and demonstrates excellent concordance with the Mayo Clinic 2004 model [ 71 ]. In patients with renal AL amyloidosis, one of the important clinical relevant endpoints is the risk of dialysis dependence. Palladini et al. demonstrated that estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <50 ml/min/1.73 m 2 and 24 h proteinuria >5 g/dL reliably predicted the risk of dialysis dependence, with a 3-year rate of 60–85% when both these risk factors were present [ 72 ]. With advances in treatment options for AL amyloidosis and incorporation of daratumumab in the frontline treatment, early mortality has started to decrease, and the relevance of these prognostic markers in the current treatment era remains to be investigated [ 73 , 74 ]. Table 5 Risk Stratification Models and Staging Systems for AL Amyloidosis. Risk Stratification and Variables Stages and proportion of patients HR and Median OS for Mortality (95% CI) Mayo Clinic 2004 Risk Stratification with European Modification • Troponin T ≥ 0.035 ng/mL (1 point) • NT-proBNP ≥332 pg/mL (1 point) • NT-proBNP >8500 pg/mL for Stage IIIB Stage I (Score 0): Both Troponin T and NT-proBNP below threshold Stage II (Score 1): One of two markers above threshold Stage III (Score 2): both markers above cutoff European Modification (Stage IIIB): Troponin T ≥ 0.035 ng/mL and NT-proBNP>8500 pg/mL Stage I: HR: 1.0 (reference) Median OS: 26.4 months Stage II: HR: 2.5 Median OS: 10.5 months Stage III: HR: 6.7 Median OS: 3.5 months [Stage IIIA- NT-proBNP ≤8500 pg/mL: HR of 4.9] Stage IIIB: HR: 11.1 Mayo Clinic 2012 Model • dFLC≥18 mg/dL (1 point) • cTnT ≥ 0.025 ng/mL (1 point) • NT-proBNP ≥ 1800 pg/mL (1 point) Stage I (Score 0): None of the marker above cutoff Stage II (Score 1): One of the three markers above cutoff Stage III (Score 2): any two markers above cutoff Stage IV (Score 3): All three markers above cutoff Stage I: HR:1.0 (reference) Median OS: 94.1 months [5-year OS: 59%] Stage II: HR: 1.7 Median OS: 40.3 months [5-year OS: 42%] Stage III: HR: 4.1 Median OS: 14 months [5-year OS: 20%] Stage IV: HR: 6.3 Median OS: 5.8 months[5-year OS: 14%] Renal AL staging Stage 3-year risk of dialysis dependence Risk Factors: • eGFR >50 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (normalized body surface area) • 24 h proteinuria >5 g Stage I: neither risk factor present Stage II: one of the two risk factors present Stage III: both risk factors present 0% in the derivation cohort 4% in the validation cohort 15% in the derivation cohort 30% in the validation cohort 60% in the derivation cohort 85% in the validation cohort cTnT cardiac troponin T, dFLC difference in involved and uninvolved serum free light chains, eGFR estimate glomerular filtration rate, HR Hazard Ratio, OS overall survival.

Summary

Risk stratification in plasma cell disorders is inherently complex, requiring a nuanced assessment that integrates clone-related characteristics, tumor burden, and host-specific factors. As we advance into an era of increasingly personalized therapy, accurately identifying patients at highest risk of mortality becomes essential—not only to tailor therapeutic interventions but also to prioritize the development of novel treatment strategies aimed at improving outcomes. Conversely, individuals projected to have excellent long-term survival may benefit from approaches that reduce treatment intensity. For these patients, exploring de-escalation strategies holds the promise of minimizing toxicity and preserving quality of life without compromising efficacy. At the core of these advances lies accurate and personalized risk assessment, which serves as the foundation for truly individualized care. In this review, we have summarized the current state-of-the-art risk stratification systems that we recommend for clinical use when treating patients with the spectrum of clonal plasma cell disorders.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Table 1

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41375-025-02654-y.

Author contributions

SZ and SVR conceptualized and wrote the manuscript. Both authors approved the submitted version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

1. Siegel RL Kratzer TB Giaquinto AN Sung H Jemal A Cancer statistics, 2025 CA Cancer J Clin 2025 75 10 45 39817679 10.3322/caac.21871 PMC11745215 Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2025. CA Cancer J Clin. 2025;75:10–45. 39817679 10.3322/caac.21871 PMC11745215

2. Joseph NS Kaufman JL Dhodapkar MV Hofmeister CC Almaula DK Heffner LT Long-term follow-up results of lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone induction therapy and risk-adapted maintenance approach in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma J Clin Oncol 2020 38 1928 37 10.1200/JCO.19.02515 32298201 PMC7587409 Joseph NS, Kaufman JL, Dhodapkar MV, Hofmeister CC, Almaula DK, Heffner LT, et al. Long-term follow-up results of lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone induction therapy and risk-adapted maintenance approach in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:1928–37. 32298201 10.1200/JCO.19.02515 PMC7587409

3. Rajkumar SV Multiple myeloma: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management Am J Hematol 2024 99 1802 24 10.1002/ajh.27422 38943315 PMC11404783 Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2024;99:1802–24. 38943315 10.1002/ajh.27422 PMC11404783

4. Durie BGM Salmon SE A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survival Cancer 1975 36 842 54 10.1002/1097-0142(197509)36:3<842::AID-CNCR2820360303>3.0.CO;2-U 1182674 Durie BGM, Salmon SE. A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survival. Cancer. 1975;36:842–54. 1182674 10.1002/1097-0142(197509)36:3<842::aid-cncr2820360303>3.0.co;2-u

5. Greipp PR Miguel JS Durie BGM Crowley JJ Barlogie B Bladé J International staging system for multiple myeloma J Clin Oncol 2005 23 3412 20 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.242 15809451 Greipp PR, Miguel JS, Durie BGM, Crowley JJ, Barlogie B, Bladé J, et al. International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:3412–20. 15809451 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.242

6. Attal M Lauwers-Cances V Hulin C Leleu X Caillot D Escoffre M Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone with transplantation for myeloma N Engl J Med 2017 376 1311 20 10.1056/NEJMoa1611750 28379796 PMC6201242 Attal M, Lauwers-Cances V, Hulin C, Leleu X, Caillot D, Escoffre M, et al. Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone with transplantation for myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1311–20. 28379796 10.1056/NEJMoa1611750 PMC6201242

7. Chng WJ Dispenzieri A Chim CS Fonseca R Goldschmidt H Lentzsch S IMWG consensus on risk stratification in multiple myeloma Leukemia 2014 28 269 77 10.1038/leu.2013.247 23974982 Chng WJ, Dispenzieri A, Chim CS, Fonseca R, Goldschmidt H, Lentzsch S, et al. IMWG consensus on risk stratification in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2014;28:269–77. 23974982 10.1038/leu.2013.247

8. Palumbo A Avet-Loiseau H Oliva S Lokhorst HM Goldschmidt H Rosinol L Revised international staging system for multiple myeloma: a report from International Myeloma Working Group J Clin Oncol 2015 33 2863 9 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.2267 26240224 PMC4846284 Palumbo A, Avet-Loiseau H, Oliva S, Lokhorst HM, Goldschmidt H, Rosinol L, et al. Revised international staging system for multiple myeloma: a report from International Myeloma Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:2863–9. 26240224 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.2267 PMC4846284

9. D’Agostino M Cairns DA Lahuerta JJ Wester R Bertsch U Waage A Second revision of the International Staging System (R2-ISS) for overall survival in multiple myeloma: A European Myeloma Network (EMN) report within the HARMONY project J Clin Oncol 2022 40 3406 18 10.1200/JCO.21.02614 35605179 D’Agostino M, Cairns DA, Lahuerta JJ, Wester R, Bertsch U, Waage A, et al. Second revision of the International Staging System (R2-ISS) for overall survival in multiple myeloma: A European Myeloma Network (EMN) report within the HARMONY project. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:3406–18. 35605179 10.1200/JCO.21.02614

10. Abdallah NH Binder M Rajkumar SV Greipp PT Kapoor P Dispenzieri A A simple additive staging system for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma Blood Cancer J 2022 12 21 10.1038/s41408-022-00611-x 35102148 PMC8803917 Abdallah NH, Binder M, Rajkumar SV, Greipp PT, Kapoor P, Dispenzieri A, et al. A simple additive staging system for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2022;12:21. 35102148 10.1038/s41408-022-00611-x PMC8803917

11. Schavgoulidze A Talbot A Perrot A Cazaubiel T Leleu X Manier S Biallelic deletion of 1p32 defines ultra-high-risk myeloma, but monoallelic del(1p32) remains a strong prognostic factor Blood 2023 141 1308 15 10.1182/blood.2022017863 36375118 PMC10163308 Schavgoulidze A, Talbot A, Perrot A, Cazaubiel T, Leleu X, Manier S, et al. Biallelic deletion of 1p32 defines ultra-high-risk myeloma, but monoallelic del(1p32) remains a strong prognostic factor. Blood. 2023;141:1308–15. 36375118 10.1182/blood.2022017863 PMC10163308

12. Walker BA Mavrommatis K Wardell CP Ashby TC Bauer M Davies F A high-risk, double-hit, group of newly diagnosed myeloma identified by genomic analysis Leukemia 2019 33 159 70 10.1038/s41375-018-0196-8 29967379 PMC6326953 Walker BA, Mavrommatis K, Wardell CP, Ashby TC, Bauer M, Davies F, et al. A high-risk, double-hit, group of newly diagnosed myeloma identified by genomic analysis. Leukemia. 2019;33:159–70. 29967379 10.1038/s41375-018-0196-8 PMC6326953

13. Weinhold N Salwender HJ Cairns DA Raab MS Waldron G Blau IW Chromosome 1q21 abnormalities refine outcome prediction in patients with multiple myeloma - a meta-analysis of 2,596 trial patients Haematologica 2021 106 2754 8 10.3324/haematol.2021.278888 34092058 PMC8485656 Weinhold N, Salwender HJ, Cairns DA, Raab MS, Waldron G, Blau IW, et al. Chromosome 1q21 abnormalities refine outcome prediction in patients with multiple myeloma - a meta-analysis of 2,596 trial patients. Haematologica. 2021;106:2754–8. 34092058 10.3324/haematol.2021.278888 PMC8485656

14. Abdallah N Greipp P Kapoor P Gertz MA Dispenzieri A Baughn LB Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with chromosome 1q abnormalities Blood Adv 2020 4 3509 19 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002218 32750129 PMC7422105 Abdallah N, Greipp P, Kapoor P, Gertz MA, Dispenzieri A, Baughn LB, et al. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with chromosome 1q abnormalities. Blood Adv. 2020;4:3509–19. 32750129 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002218 PMC7422105

15. Boyle EM, Blaney P, Stoeckle JH, Wang Y, Ghamlouch H, Gagler D, et al. Multiomic mapping of acquired chromosome 1 copy number and structural variants to identify therapeutic vulnerabilities in multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res 2023;29:3901–13. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-3209 PMC12166981 37449980

16. Stong N Ortiz-Estévez M Towfic F Samur M Agarwal A Corre J The location of the t(4;14) translocation breakpoint within the NSD2 gene identifies a subset of patients with high-risk NDMM Blood 2023 141 1574 83 10.1182/blood.2022016212 35984902 PMC10163314 Stong N, Ortiz-Estévez M, Towfic F, Samur M, Agarwal A, Corre J, et al. The location of the t(4;14) translocation breakpoint within the NSD2 gene identifies a subset of patients with high-risk NDMM. Blood. 2023;141:1574–83. 35984902 10.1182/blood.2022016212 PMC10163314

17. Walker BA Wardell CP Murison A Boyle EM Begum DB Dahir NM APOBEC family mutational signatures are associated with poor prognosis translocations in multiple myeloma Nat Comm 2015 6 6997 10.1038/ncomms7997 PMC4568299 25904160 Walker BA, Wardell CP, Murison A, Boyle EM, Begum DB, Dahir NM, et al. APOBEC family mutational signatures are associated with poor prognosis translocations in multiple myeloma. Nat Comm. 2015;6:6997. 10.1038/ncomms7997 PMC4568299 25904160

18. Maura F Petljak M Lionetti M Cifola I Liang W Pinatel E Biological and prognostic impact of APOBEC-induced mutations in the spectrum of plasma cell dyscrasias and multiple myeloma cell lines Leukemia 2018 32 1043 7 10.1038/leu.2017.345 PMC5886048 29209044 Maura F, Petljak M, Lionetti M, Cifola I, Liang W, Pinatel E, et al. Biological and prognostic impact of APOBEC-induced mutations in the spectrum of plasma cell dyscrasias and multiple myeloma cell lines. Leukemia. 2018;32:1043–7. 10.1038/leu.2017.345 PMC5886048 29209044

19. Mian H Kaiser M Fonseca R Still high risk? A review of translocation t(14;16) in multiple myeloma Am J Hematol 2024 99 1979 87 10.1002/ajh.27419 38874195 Mian H, Kaiser M, Fonseca R. Still high risk? A review of translocation t(14;16) in multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol. 2024;99:1979–87. 38874195 10.1002/ajh.27419

20. Avet-Loiseau H, Davies FE, Samur MK, Corre J, D'Agostino M, Kaiser MF, et al. International Myeloma Society/International Myeloma Working Group Consensus Recommendations on the Definition of High-Risk Multiple Myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2025:JCO2401893. Epub ahead of print. 10.1200/JCO-24-01893 PMC13445576 40489728

21. Garcés JJ Cedena MT Puig N Burgos L Perez JJ Cordon L Circulating tumor cells for the staging of patients with newly diagnosed transplant-eligible multiple myeloma J Clin Oncol 2022 40 3151 61 10.1200/JCO.21.01365 35666958 Garcés JJ, Cedena MT, Puig N, Burgos L, Perez JJ, Cordon L, et al. Circulating tumor cells for the staging of patients with newly diagnosed transplant-eligible multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:3151–61. 35666958 10.1200/JCO.21.01365

22. Gonsalves WI Jevremovic D Nandakumar B Dispenzieri A Buadi FK Dingli D Enhancing the R-ISS classification of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma by quantifying circulating clonal plasma cells Am J Hematol 2020 95 310 5 10.1002/ajh.25709 31867775 PMC7724649 Gonsalves WI, Jevremovic D, Nandakumar B, Dispenzieri A, Buadi FK, Dingli D, et al. Enhancing the R-ISS classification of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma by quantifying circulating clonal plasma cells. Am J Hematol. 2020;95:310–5. 31867775 10.1002/ajh.25709 PMC7724649

23. Bladé J Beksac M Caers J Jurczyszyn A von Lilienfeld-Toal M Moreau P Extramedullary disease in multiple myeloma: a systematic literature review Blood Cancer J 2022 12 45 10.1038/s41408-022-00643-3 35314675 PMC8938478 Bladé J, Beksac M, Caers J, Jurczyszyn A, von Lilienfeld-Toal M, Moreau P, et al. Extramedullary disease in multiple myeloma: a systematic literature review. Blood Cancer J. 2022;12:45. 35314675 10.1038/s41408-022-00643-3 PMC8938478

24. Zanwar S Ho M Lin Y Kapoor P Binder M Buadi FK Natural history, predictors of development of extramedullary disease, and treatment outcomes for patients with extramedullary multiple myeloma Am J Hematol 2023 98 1540 9 10.1002/ajh.27023 37421603 Zanwar S, Ho M, Lin Y, Kapoor P, Binder M, Buadi FK, et al. Natural history, predictors of development of extramedullary disease, and treatment outcomes for patients with extramedullary multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol. 2023;98:1540–9. 37421603 10.1002/ajh.27023

25. van Beers EH van Vliet MH Kuiper R de Best L Anderson KC Chari A Prognostic validation of SKY92 and its combination with ISS in an independent cohort of patients with multiple myeloma Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2017 17 555 62 10.1016/j.clml.2017.06.020 28735890 van Beers EH, van Vliet MH, Kuiper R, de Best L, Anderson KC, Chari A, et al. Prognostic validation of SKY92 and its combination with ISS in an independent cohort of patients with multiple myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017;17:555–62. 28735890 10.1016/j.clml.2017.06.020

26. Shaughnessy JD Jr Zhan F Burington BE Huang Y Colla S Hanamura I A validated gene expression model of high-risk multiple myeloma is defined by deregulated expression of genes mapping to chromosome 1 Blood 2006 109 2276 84 10.1182/blood-2006-07-038430 17105813 Shaughnessy JD Jr, Zhan F, Burington BE, Huang Y, Colla S, Hanamura I, et al. A validated gene expression model of high-risk multiple myeloma is defined by deregulated expression of genes mapping to chromosome 1. Blood. 2006;109:2276–84. 17105813 10.1182/blood-2006-07-038430

27. Zanwar S Jevremovic D Kapoor P Olteanu H Buadi F Horna P Clonal plasma cell proportion in the synthetic phase identifies a unique high-risk cohort in multiple myeloma Blood Cancer J 2025 15 20 10.1038/s41408-025-01232-w 39966346 PMC11836398 Zanwar S, Jevremovic D, Kapoor P, Olteanu H, Buadi F, Horna P, et al. Clonal plasma cell proportion in the synthetic phase identifies a unique high-risk cohort in multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2025;15:20. 39966346 10.1038/s41408-025-01232-w PMC11836398

28. Facon T Dimopoulos MA Meuleman N Belch A Mohty M Chen W-M A simplified frailty scale predicts outcomes in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated in the FIRST (MM-020) trial Leukemia 2020 34 224 33 10.1038/s41375-019-0539-0 31427722 PMC7214253 Facon T, Dimopoulos MA, Meuleman N, Belch A, Mohty M, Chen W-M, et al. A simplified frailty scale predicts outcomes in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated in the FIRST (MM-020) trial. Leukemia. 2020;34:224–33. 31427722 10.1038/s41375-019-0539-0 PMC7214253

29. Munshi NC Avet-Loiseau H Anderson KC Neri P Paiva B Samur M A large meta-analysis establishes the role of MRD negativity in long-term survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma Blood Adv 2020 4 5988 99 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002827 33284948 PMC7724898 Munshi NC, Avet-Loiseau H, Anderson KC, Neri P, Paiva B, Samur M, et al. A large meta-analysis establishes the role of MRD negativity in long-term survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2020;4:5988–99. 33284948 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002827 PMC7724898

30. Landgren O Prior TJ Masterson T Heuck C Bueno OF Dash AB EVIDENCE meta-analysis: evaluating minimal residual disease as an intermediate clinical end point for multiple myeloma Blood 2024 144 359 67 10.1182/blood.2024024371 38768337 PMC11418064 Landgren O, Prior TJ, Masterson T, Heuck C, Bueno OF, Dash AB, et al. EVIDENCE meta-analysis: evaluating minimal residual disease as an intermediate clinical end point for multiple myeloma. Blood. 2024;144:359–67. 38768337 10.1182/blood.2024024371 PMC11418064

31. Rajkumar SV Larson D Kyle RA Diagnosis of smoldering multiple myeloma N Engl J Med 2011 365 474 5 10.1056/NEJMc1106428 21812699 PMC3773467 Rajkumar SV, Larson D, Kyle RA. Diagnosis of smoldering multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:474–5. 21812699 10.1056/NEJMc1106428 PMC3773467

32. Kyle RA Larson DR Therneau TM Dispenzieri A Kumar S Cerhan JR Long-term follow-up of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance N Engl J Med 2018 378 241 9 10.1056/NEJMoa1709974 29342381 PMC5852672 Kyle RA, Larson DR, Therneau TM, Dispenzieri A, Kumar S, Cerhan JR, et al. Long-term follow-up of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:241–9. 29342381 10.1056/NEJMoa1709974 PMC5852672

33. Wadhera RK Rajkumar SV Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a systematic review Mayo Clin Proc 2010 85 933 42 10.4065/mcp.2010.0337 20713974 PMC2947966 Wadhera RK, Rajkumar SV. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a systematic review. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85:933–42. 20713974 10.4065/mcp.2010.0337 PMC2947966

34. Landgren O Kyle RA Pfeiffer RM Katzmann JA Caporaso NE Hayes RB Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: a prospective study Blood 2009 113 5412 7 10.1182/blood-2008-12-194241 19179464 PMC2689042 Landgren O, Kyle RA, Pfeiffer RM, Katzmann JA, Caporaso NE, Hayes RB, et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: a prospective study. Blood. 2009;113:5412–7. 19179464 10.1182/blood-2008-12-194241 PMC2689042

35. Kyle RA Therneau TM Rajkumar SV Offord JR Larson DR Plevak MF A long-term study of prognosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance N Engl J Med 2002 346 564 9 10.1056/NEJMoa01133202 11856795 Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV, Offord JR, Larson DR, Plevak MF, et al. A long-term study of prognosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:564–9. 11856795 10.1056/NEJMoa01133202

36. Rajkumar SV Kyle RA Therneau TM Melton LJ 3rd Bradwell AR Clark RJ Serum free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance Blood 2005 106 812 7 10.1182/blood-2005-03-1038 15855274 PMC1895159 Rajkumar SV, Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Melton LJ 3rd, Bradwell AR, Clark RJ, et al. Serum free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Blood. 2005;106:812–7. 15855274 10.1182/blood-2005-03-1038 PMC1895159

37. Kyle RA Durie BG Rajkumar SV Landgren O Blade J Merlini G Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: IMWG consensus perspectives risk factors for progression and guidelines for monitoring and management Leukemia 2010 24 1121 7 10.1038/leu.2010.60 20410922 PMC7020664 Kyle RA, Durie BG, Rajkumar SV, Landgren O, Blade J, Merlini G, et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: IMWG consensus perspectives risk factors for progression and guidelines for monitoring and management. Leukemia. 2010;24:1121–7. 20410922 10.1038/leu.2010.60 PMC7020664

38. Zuern K Hielscher T Werly A Breitkreutz I Sauer S Raab MS Longitudinal assessment of established risk stratification models in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance Blood Cancer J 2024 14 148 10.1038/s41408-024-01126-3 39191769 PMC11349746 Zuern K, Hielscher T, Werly A, Breitkreutz I, Sauer S, Raab MS, et al. Longitudinal assessment of established risk stratification models in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Blood Cancer J. 2024;14:148. 39191769 10.1038/s41408-024-01126-3 PMC11349746

39. Landgren O Hofmann JN McShane CM Santo L Hultcrantz M Korde N Association of immune marker changes with progression of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance to multiple myeloma JAMA Oncol 2019 5 1293 301 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1568 31318385 PMC6646992 Landgren O, Hofmann JN, McShane CM, Santo L, Hultcrantz M, Korde N, et al. Association of immune marker changes with progression of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance to multiple myeloma. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:1293–301. 31318385 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1568 PMC6646992

40. Paiva B Vídriales MB Rosiñol L Martínez-López J Mateos MV Ocio EM A multiparameter flow cytometry immunophenotypic algorithm for the identification of newly diagnosed symptomatic myeloma with an MGUS-like signature and long-term disease control Leukemia 2013 27 2056 61 10.1038/leu.2013.166 23743858 Paiva B, Vídriales MB, Rosiñol L, Martínez-López J, Mateos MV, Ocio EM, et al. A multiparameter flow cytometry immunophenotypic algorithm for the identification of newly diagnosed symptomatic myeloma with an MGUS-like signature and long-term disease control. Leukemia. 2013;27:2056–61. 23743858 10.1038/leu.2013.166

41. Turesson I Kovalchik SA Pfeiffer RM Kristinsson SY Goldin LR Drayson MT Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and risk of lymphoid and myeloid malignancies: 728 cases followed up to 30 years in Sweden Blood 2014 123 338 45 10.1182/blood-2013-05-505487 24222331 PMC3894492 Turesson I, Kovalchik SA, Pfeiffer RM, Kristinsson SY, Goldin LR, Drayson MT, et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and risk of lymphoid and myeloid malignancies: 728 cases followed up to 30 years in Sweden. Blood. 2014;123:338–45. 24222331 10.1182/blood-2013-05-505487 PMC3894492

42. Go RS Rajkumar SV How I manage monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance Blood 2018 131 163 73 10.1182/blood-2017-09-807560 29183887 PMC5757684 Go RS, Rajkumar SV. How I manage monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Blood. 2018;131:163–73. 29183887 10.1182/blood-2017-09-807560 PMC5757684

43. Eythorsson E Rognvaldsson S Thorsteinsdottir S Einarsson Long T Reed ER Sigurdardottir GA Development of a multivariable model to predict the need for bone marrow sampling in persons with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance : a cohort study nested in a clinical trial Ann Intern Med 2024 177 449 57 10.7326/M23-2540 38560901 PMC12509071 Eythorsson E, Rognvaldsson S, Thorsteinsdottir S, Einarsson Long T, Reed ER, Sigurdardottir GA, et al. Development of a multivariable model to predict the need for bone marrow sampling in persons with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance : a cohort study nested in a clinical trial. Ann Intern Med. 2024;177:449–57. 38560901 10.7326/M23-2540 PMC12509071

44. Kyle RA Remstein ED Therneau TM Dispenzieri A Kurtin PJ Hodnefield JM Clinical course and prognosis of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma N Engl J Med 2007 356 2582 90 10.1056/NEJMoa070389 17582068 Kyle RA, Remstein ED, Therneau TM, Dispenzieri A, Kurtin PJ, Hodnefield JM, et al. Clinical course and prognosis of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2582–90. 17582068 10.1056/NEJMoa070389

45. Thorsteinsdóttir S Gíslason GK Aspelund T Rögnvaldsson S Óskarsson JÞ Sigurðardóttir GÁ Prevalence of smoldering multiple myeloma based on nationwide screening Nat Med 2023 29 467 72 10.1038/s41591-022-02183-6 36747117 PMC11099842 Thorsteinsdóttir S, Gíslason GK, Aspelund T, Rögnvaldsson S, Óskarsson JÞ, Sigurðardóttir GÁ, et al. Prevalence of smoldering multiple myeloma based on nationwide screening. Nat Med. 2023;29:467–72. 36747117 10.1038/s41591-022-02183-6 PMC11099842

46. Pérez-Persona E Vidriales MB Mateo G García-Sanz R Mateos MV de Coca AG New criteria to identify risk of progression in monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance and smoldering multiple myeloma based on multiparameter flow cytometry analysis of bone marrow plasma cells Blood 2007 110 2586 92 10.1182/blood-2007-05-088443 17576818 Pérez-Persona E, Vidriales MB, Mateo G, García-Sanz R, Mateos MV, de Coca AG, et al. New criteria to identify risk of progression in monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance and smoldering multiple myeloma based on multiparameter flow cytometry analysis of bone marrow plasma cells. Blood. 2007;110:2586–92. 17576818 10.1182/blood-2007-05-088443

47. Lakshman A Rajkumar SV Buadi FK Binder M Gertz MA Lacy MQ Risk stratification of smoldering multiple myeloma incorporating revised IMWG diagnostic criteria Blood Cancer J 2018 8 59 10.1038/s41408-018-0077-4 29895887 PMC5997745 Lakshman A, Rajkumar SV, Buadi FK, Binder M, Gertz MA, Lacy MQ, et al. Risk stratification of smoldering multiple myeloma incorporating revised IMWG diagnostic criteria. Blood Cancer J. 2018;8:59. 29895887 10.1038/s41408-018-0077-4 PMC5997745

48. Mateos M-V Kumar S Dimopoulos MA González-Calle V Kastritis E Hajek R International Myeloma Working Group risk stratification model for smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) Blood Cancer J 2020 10 102 10.1038/s41408-020-00366-3 33067414 PMC7567803 Mateos M-V, Kumar S, Dimopoulos MA, González-Calle V, Kastritis E, Hajek R, et al. International Myeloma Working Group risk stratification model for smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). Blood Cancer J. 2020;10:102. 33067414 10.1038/s41408-020-00366-3 PMC7567803

49. Visram A Rajkumar SV Kapoor P Dispenzieri A Lacy MQ Gertz MA Assessing the prognostic utility of smoldering multiple myeloma risk stratification scores applied serially post diagnosis Blood Cancer J 2021 11 186 10.1038/s41408-021-00569-2 34836942 PMC8626440 Visram A, Rajkumar SV, Kapoor P, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Gertz MA, et al. Assessing the prognostic utility of smoldering multiple myeloma risk stratification scores applied serially post diagnosis. Blood Cancer J. 2021;11:186. 34836942 10.1038/s41408-021-00569-2 PMC8626440

50. de Daniel A Rodríguez-Lobato LG Tovar N Cibeira MT Moreno DF Oliver-Caldés A The evolving pattern of the monoclonal protein improves the IMWG 2/20/20 classification for patients with smoldering multiple myeloma Hemasphere 2024 8 e76 10.1002/hem3.76 38716147 PMC11072197 de Daniel A, Rodríguez-Lobato LG, Tovar N, Cibeira MT, Moreno DF, Oliver-Caldés A, et al. The evolving pattern of the monoclonal protein improves the IMWG 2/20/20 classification for patients with smoldering multiple myeloma. Hemasphere. 2024;8:e76. 38716147 10.1002/hem3.76 PMC11072197

51. Dimopoulos MA, Voorhees PM, Schjesvold F, Cohen YC, Hungria V, Sandhu I, et al. Daratumumab or active monitoring for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2024;392:1777–88. 10.1056/NEJMoa2409029 39652675

52. Paiva B Corchete LA Vidriales MB Garcia-Sanz R Perez JJ Aires-Mejia I The cellular origin and malignant transformation of Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia Blood 2015 125 2370 80 10.1182/blood-2014-09-602565 25655603 Paiva B, Corchete LA, Vidriales MB, Garcia-Sanz R, Perez JJ, Aires-Mejia I, et al. The cellular origin and malignant transformation of Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. Blood. 2015;125:2370–80. 25655603 10.1182/blood-2014-09-602565

53. Gertz MA Waldenström macroglobulinemia: 2025 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management Am J Hematol; 2025 100 1061 73 10.1002/ajh.27666 40095219 Gertz MA. Waldenström macroglobulinemia: 2025 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management. Am J Hematol;. 2025;100:1061–73. 40095219 10.1002/ajh.27666

54. Zanwar S Abeykoon JP Ansell SM Gertz MA Colby C Larson D Disease outcomes and biomarkers of progression in smouldering Waldenström macroglobulinaemia Br J Haematol 2021 195 210 6 10.1111/bjh.17691 34340248 Zanwar S, Abeykoon JP, Ansell SM, Gertz MA, Colby C, Larson D, et al. Disease outcomes and biomarkers of progression in smouldering Waldenström macroglobulinaemia. Br J Haematol. 2021;195:210–6. 34340248 10.1111/bjh.17691

55. Kyle RA Treon SP Alexanian R Barlogie B Bjorkholm M Dhodapkar M Prognostic markers and criteria to initiate therapy in Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia: consensus panel recommendations from the Second International Workshop on Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia Semin Oncol 2003 30 116 20 10.1053/sonc.2003.50038 12720119 Kyle RA, Treon SP, Alexanian R, Barlogie B, Bjorkholm M, Dhodapkar M, et al. Prognostic markers and criteria to initiate therapy in Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia: consensus panel recommendations from the Second International Workshop on Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia. Semin Oncol. 2003;30:116–20. 12720119 10.1053/sonc.2003.50038

56. Kyle RA Benson JT Larson DR Therneau TM Dispenzieri A Kumar S Progression in smoldering Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia: long-term results Blood 2012 119 4462 6 10.1182/blood-2011-10-384768 22451426 PMC3362362 Kyle RA, Benson JT, Larson DR, Therneau TM, Dispenzieri A, Kumar S, et al. Progression in smoldering Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia: long-term results. Blood. 2012;119:4462–6. 22451426 10.1182/blood-2011-10-384768 PMC3362362

57. Bustoros M, Sklavenitis-Pistofidis R, Kapoor P, Liu CJ, Kastritis E, Zanwar S, et al. Progression risk stratification of asymptomatic Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:1403–11. 10.1200/JCO.19.00394 PMC6544461 30990729

58. Varettoni M Zibellini S Defrancesco I Ferretti VV Rizzo E Malcovati L Pattern of somatic mutations in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia or IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance Haematologica 2017 102 2077 85 10.3324/haematol.2017.172718 28983055 PMC5709107 Varettoni M, Zibellini S, Defrancesco I, Ferretti VV, Rizzo E, Malcovati L, et al. Pattern of somatic mutations in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia or IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Haematologica. 2017;102:2077–85. 28983055 10.3324/haematol.2017.172718 PMC5709107

59. Zanwar S Kapoor P Diagnosis and risk stratification in Waldenström macroglobulinemia J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 2024 22 e247024 10.6004/jnccn.2024.7024 39236757 Zanwar S, Kapoor P. Diagnosis and risk stratification in Waldenström macroglobulinemia. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2024;22:e247024. 10.6004/jnccn.2024.7024 39236757

60. Morel P Duhamel A Gobbi P Dimopoulos MA Dhodapkar MV McCoy J International prognostic scoring system for Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia Blood 2009 113 4163 70 10.1182/blood-2008-08-174961 19196866 Morel P, Duhamel A, Gobbi P, Dimopoulos MA, Dhodapkar MV, McCoy J, et al. International prognostic scoring system for Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. Blood. 2009;113:4163–70. 19196866 10.1182/blood-2008-08-174961

61. Zanwar S, Le-Rademacher J, Durot E, D’Sa S, Abeykoon JP, Mondello P, et al. Simplified risk stratification model for patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42:2527–36. 10.1200/JCO.23.02066 PMC11268554 38788183

62. Sanchorawala V Systemic light chain amyloidosis N Engl J Med 2024 390 2295 307 10.1056/NEJMra2304088 38924733 Sanchorawala V. Systemic light chain amyloidosis. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:2295–307. 38924733 10.1056/NEJMra2304088

63. Kyle RA Larson DR Kurtin PJ Kumar S Cerhan JR Therneau TM Incidence of AL amyloidosis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1990 through 2015 Mayo Clin Proc 2019 94 465 71 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.08.041 30713046 PMC6401262 Kyle RA, Larson DR, Kurtin PJ, Kumar S, Cerhan JR, Therneau TM, et al. Incidence of AL amyloidosis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1990 through 2015. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94:465–71. 30713046 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.08.041 PMC6401262

64. Kyle RA Linos A Beard CM Linke RP Gertz MA O’Fallon WM Incidence and natural history of primary systemic amyloidosis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1950 through 1989 Blood 1992 79 1817 22 10.1182/blood.V79.7.1817.1817 1558973 Kyle RA, Linos A, Beard CM, Linke RP, Gertz MA, O’Fallon WM, et al. Incidence and natural history of primary systemic amyloidosis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1950 through 1989. Blood. 1992;79:1817–22. 1558973

65. Quock TP Yan T Chang E Guthrie S Broder MS Epidemiology of AL amyloidosis: a real-world study using US claims data Blood Adv 2018 2 1046 53 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018016402 29748430 PMC5965052 Quock TP, Yan T, Chang E, Guthrie S, Broder MS. Epidemiology of AL amyloidosis: a real-world study using US claims data. Blood Adv. 2018;2:1046–53. 29748430 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018016402 PMC5965052

66. Dispenzieri A Gertz MA Kyle RA Lacy MQ Burritt MF Therneau TM Serum cardiac troponins and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide: a staging system for primary systemic amyloidosis J Clin Oncol 2004 22 3751 7 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.029 15365071 Dispenzieri A, Gertz MA, Kyle RA, Lacy MQ, Burritt MF, Therneau TM, et al. Serum cardiac troponins and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide: a staging system for primary systemic amyloidosis. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3751–7. 15365071 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.029

67. Wechalekar AD Schonland SO Kastritis E Gillmore JD Dimopoulos MA Lane T A European collaborative study of treatment outcomes in 346 patients with cardiac stage III AL amyloidosis Blood 2013 121 3420 7 10.1182/blood-2012-12-473066 23479568 Wechalekar AD, Schonland SO, Kastritis E, Gillmore JD, Dimopoulos MA, Lane T, et al. A European collaborative study of treatment outcomes in 346 patients with cardiac stage III AL amyloidosis. Blood. 2013;121:3420–7. 23479568 10.1182/blood-2012-12-473066

68. Kumar S Dispenzieri A Lacy MQ Hayman SR Buadi FK Colby C Revised prognostic staging system for light chain amyloidosis incorporating cardiac biomarkers and serum free light chain measurements J Clin Oncol 2012 30 989 95 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.5724 22331953 PMC3675680 Kumar S, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Buadi FK, Colby C, et al. Revised prognostic staging system for light chain amyloidosis incorporating cardiac biomarkers and serum free light chain measurements. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:989–95. 22331953 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.5724 PMC3675680

69. Muchtar E Dispenzieri A Gertz MA Kumar SK Buadi FK Leung N Treatment of AL amyloidosis: Mayo stratification of myeloma and risk-adapted therapy (mSMART) consensus statement 2020 update Mayo Clin Proc 2021 96 1546 77 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.03.012 34088417 Muchtar E, Dispenzieri A, Gertz MA, Kumar SK, Buadi FK, Leung N, et al. Treatment of AL amyloidosis: Mayo stratification of myeloma and risk-adapted therapy (mSMART) consensus statement 2020 update. Mayo Clin Proc. 2021;96:1546–77. 34088417 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.03.012

70. Zanwar S Gertz MA Muchtar E Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis: diagnosis and risk assessment J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 2023 21 83 90 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7077 PMC10164359 36630897 Zanwar S, Gertz MA, Muchtar E. Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis: diagnosis and risk assessment. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2023;21:83–90. 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7077 PMC10164359 36630897

71. Lilleness B Ruberg FL Mussinelli R Doros G Sanchorawala V Development and validation of a survival staging system incorporating BNP in patients with light chain amyloidosis Blood 2019 133 215 23 10.1182/blood-2018-06-858951 30333122 Lilleness B, Ruberg FL, Mussinelli R, Doros G, Sanchorawala V. Development and validation of a survival staging system incorporating BNP in patients with light chain amyloidosis. Blood. 2019;133:215–23. 30333122 10.1182/blood-2018-06-858951

72. Palladini G Hegenbart U Milani P Kimmich C Foli A Ho AD A staging system for renal outcome and early markers of renal response to chemotherapy in AL amyloidosis Blood 2014 124 2325 32 10.1182/blood-2014-04-570010 25115890 Palladini G, Hegenbart U, Milani P, Kimmich C, Foli A, Ho AD, et al. A staging system for renal outcome and early markers of renal response to chemotherapy in AL amyloidosis. Blood. 2014;124:2325–32. 25115890 10.1182/blood-2014-04-570010

73. Yohannan B Rees M Gertz MA Dispenzieri A Kapoor P Buadi FK Improved survival with daratumumab-CyBorD compared to CyBorD as frontline therapy in AL amyloidosis Blood Neoplasia 2025 2 100092 10.1016/j.bneo.2025.100092 40453144 PMC12067897 Yohannan B, Rees M, Gertz MA, Dispenzieri A, Kapoor P, Buadi FK, et al. Improved survival with daratumumab-CyBorD compared to CyBorD as frontline therapy in AL amyloidosis. Blood Neoplasia. 2025;2:100092. 40453144 10.1016/j.bneo.2025.100092 PMC12067897

74. Chakraborty R Bhutani D Mapara M Reshef R Maurer MS Radhakrishnan J Reduced early mortality with Daratumumab-based frontline therapy in AL amyloidosis: a retrospective cohort study Am J Hematol 2024 99 477 9 10.1002/ajh.27179 38100285 PMC13177888 Chakraborty R, Bhutani D, Mapara M, Reshef R, Maurer MS, Radhakrishnan J, et al. Reduced early mortality with Daratumumab-based frontline therapy in AL amyloidosis: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Hematol. 2024;99:477–9. 38100285 10.1002/ajh.27179 PMC13177888