Annals of plastic surgery · 2020
Perforator Flaps Based on the Terminal Perforators of the Pectoral Branch of Thoracoacromial Vessels Axis: A Viable Option in the Head and Neck Reconstructions.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Thalaivirithan Margabandu Balakrishnan, Dympep Badamutlang, J Jaganmohan Janardhanan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this article is to develop a new method for elevating the pedicled terminal pectoral perforator flaps (PTPPFs) and to resolve the difficulties and controversies that shroud the anatomy of terminal pectoral perforators from the pectoral branch of the thoracoacromial axis.
AIM: Anatomical study was conducted to assess the feasibility of perforator flaps based on the terminal perforators of the pectoral branch of the thoracoacromial vessel axis. The knowledge that gleaned from this anatomical study was applied in the clinical scenario. A clinical retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the outcome of PTPPFs for the reconstruction of postexcisional head and neck defects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty cadaveric specimens were examined for the anatomy of the terminal musculocutaneous pectoral branch perforators. Thirty-two cases (22 males, 10 females) of various head and neck postexcision defects were reconstructed with the PTPPFs in a single-stage manner. Pectoralis major muscle with its innervation was spared in all cases. All the secondary defects were closed primarily.
RESULTS: The maximum cutaneous paddle size was 156 cm harvested on a single best terminal pectoral branch perforator. The average size of the cutaneous paddle harvested was 73.47 cm. The flap complications noted (9.3%) were trivial, and all the flaps survived well. The average institutional computed score for esthetic and functional recovery at the donor and reconstructed site done by 2 independent observers were 4.56 and 3.78, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The recruitment of the chest skin on the terminal pectoral branch perforators resulted in a long pedicle flap with adequate qualities like color match, texture match, and pliability. This flap shall serve as a primary option for pedicle and free flap head and neck reconstructions.
AIM: Anatomical study was conducted to assess the feasibility of perforator flaps based on the terminal perforators of the pectoral branch of the thoracoacromial vessel axis. The knowledge that gleaned from this anatomical study was applied in the clinical scenario. A clinical retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the outcome of PTPPFs for the reconstruction of postexcisional head and neck defects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty cadaveric specimens were examined for the anatomy of the terminal musculocutaneous pectoral branch perforators. Thirty-two cases (22 males, 10 females) of various head and neck postexcision defects were reconstructed with the PTPPFs in a single-stage manner. Pectoralis major muscle with its innervation was spared in all cases. All the secondary defects were closed primarily.
RESULTS: The maximum cutaneous paddle size was 156 cm harvested on a single best terminal pectoral branch perforator. The average size of the cutaneous paddle harvested was 73.47 cm. The flap complications noted (9.3%) were trivial, and all the flaps survived well. The average institutional computed score for esthetic and functional recovery at the donor and reconstructed site done by 2 independent observers were 4.56 and 3.78, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The recruitment of the chest skin on the terminal pectoral branch perforators resulted in a long pedicle flap with adequate qualities like color match, texture match, and pliability. This flap shall serve as a primary option for pedicle and free flap head and neck reconstructions.