Journal of dermatological science · 2019
Classification of 3097 patients from the Japanese melanoma study database using the American joint committee on cancer eighth edition cancer staging system.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fujisawa Yasuhiro, Yoshikawa Shusuke, Minagawa Akane, Takenouchi Tatsuya, Yokota Kenji, Uchi Hiroshi, Noma Naoki, Nakamura Yasuhiro, Asai Jun, Kato Junji, Fujiwara Susumu, Fukushima Satoshi, Uehara Jiro, Hoashi Toshihiko, Kaji Tatsuya, Fujimura Taku, Namikawa Kenjiro, Yoshioka Manabu, Murata Naoki, Ogata Dai, Matsuyama Kanako, Hatta Naohito, Shibayama Yoshitsugu, Fujiyama Toshiharu, Ishikawa Masashi, Yamada Daisuke, Kishi Akiko, Nakamura Yoshiyuki, Shimiauchi Takatoshi, Fujii Kazuyasu, Fujimoto Manabu, Ihn Hironobu, Katoh Norito
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition Cancer Staging System was implemented in 2018; however, it has not been validated in an Asian melanoma population.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to validate the new system using a cohort of Japanese melanoma patients.
METHODS: The AJCC 7th and 8th Editions were used for TNM classification of patients in a database established by the Japanese Melanoma Study Group. Patient data with sufficient information to be applicable to the AJCC 8th staging were selected. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate disease-specific survival and relapse-free survival.
RESULTS: In total, data for 3097 patients were analyzed. The 5-year disease-specific survival according to the 7th and 8th Edition staging system were as follows: IA = 98.5%/97.9%; IB = 95.4%/96.2%; IIA = 94.2%/94.1%; IIB = 84.6%/84.4%; IIC = 72.2%/72.2%; IIIA = 76.2%/87.5%; IIIB = 60.7%/72.6%; IIIC = 42.0%/55.3% and IIID = none/26.0%. The 5-year relapse-free survival according to the 7th and 8th Edition staging was as follows: IA = 94.5%/92.7%; IB = 85.4%/85.3%; IIA = 80.1%/79.4%; IIB = 71.4%/70.6%; IIC = 56.8%/55.7%; IIIA = 56.8%/69.4%; IIIB = 42.6%/56.8%; IIIC = 20.0%/33.3% and IIID = none/6.5%.
CONCLUSION: The results show that new staging system could efficiently classify our Japanese melanoma cohort. Although there was no difference in Stage I and II disease between the 7th and 8th Edition systems, we should be careful in managing Stage III disease since the survival curves of the 8th Edition staging were completely different from the 7th Edition. Moreover, our results indicate that adjuvant therapies for Stage IIB and IIC should be developed, since the relapse-free survival for these stages were equivalent to Stage IIIA and IIIB, respectively.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to validate the new system using a cohort of Japanese melanoma patients.
METHODS: The AJCC 7th and 8th Editions were used for TNM classification of patients in a database established by the Japanese Melanoma Study Group. Patient data with sufficient information to be applicable to the AJCC 8th staging were selected. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate disease-specific survival and relapse-free survival.
RESULTS: In total, data for 3097 patients were analyzed. The 5-year disease-specific survival according to the 7th and 8th Edition staging system were as follows: IA = 98.5%/97.9%; IB = 95.4%/96.2%; IIA = 94.2%/94.1%; IIB = 84.6%/84.4%; IIC = 72.2%/72.2%; IIIA = 76.2%/87.5%; IIIB = 60.7%/72.6%; IIIC = 42.0%/55.3% and IIID = none/26.0%. The 5-year relapse-free survival according to the 7th and 8th Edition staging was as follows: IA = 94.5%/92.7%; IB = 85.4%/85.3%; IIA = 80.1%/79.4%; IIB = 71.4%/70.6%; IIC = 56.8%/55.7%; IIIA = 56.8%/69.4%; IIIB = 42.6%/56.8%; IIIC = 20.0%/33.3% and IIID = none/6.5%.
CONCLUSION: The results show that new staging system could efficiently classify our Japanese melanoma cohort. Although there was no difference in Stage I and II disease between the 7th and 8th Edition systems, we should be careful in managing Stage III disease since the survival curves of the 8th Edition staging were completely different from the 7th Edition. Moreover, our results indicate that adjuvant therapies for Stage IIB and IIC should be developed, since the relapse-free survival for these stages were equivalent to Stage IIIA and IIIB, respectively.