Cancer medicine · 2023
Clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of SMARCA4-deficient non-small cell lung cancer.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liang Xiyue, Gao Xianzheng, Wang Feng, Li Shenglei, Zhou Yashu, Guo Peng, Meng Yuanyuan, Lu Taiying
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To improve the understanding of special types of tumors, we summarized and analyzed the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of SMARCA4-deficient non-small cell lung cancer (SMARCA4-dNSCLC).
METHODS: We selected 105 patients with SMARCA4-dNSCLC and 221 patients with SMARCA4-intact non-small cell lung cancer (SMARCA4-iNSCLC) by performing immunohistochemical analysis of 1520 NSCLC samples, and we assessed the patients' clinicopathological features and survival state.
RESULTS: (1) SMARCA4-dNSCLC was significantly associated with older age, male sex, smoking history, larger invasive tumor size, higher tumor proliferation index (Ki-67), more adrenal metastases, more lymph node metastases, and few EGFR mutations (p < 0.05). The tumors were mostly negative for thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1), CD34, and p40 and positive for cytokeratin 7 (CK7) in immunohistochemistry (IHC). Nineteen SMARCA4-dNSCLC patients mostly had TP53, SMARCA4, and LRP1B mutations, and 48% of them had SMARCA4 frameshift mutations. SMARCA4-dNSCLC patients have a worse prognosis than SMARCA4-iNSCLC patients (HR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.17-0.45). The overall survival (OS) of patients with stage III SMARCA4-dNSCLC was worse than that of patients with SMARCA4-iNSCLC, and the OS of stage IV SMARCA4-dNSCLC patients was also worse than that of SMARCA4-iNSCLC patients (p < 0.01). (2) Multivariate regression analysis showed that sex (HR: 4.12; 95% CI: 1.03-16.39) and smoking history (HR: 2.29; 95% CI: 1.04-5.02) had significant effects on the survival time of SMARCA4-dNSCLC patients. In SMARCA4-dNSCLC patients without distant metastases (stage I-III), patients with stage N2 or N3 lymph node metastases (HR: 6.35; 95% CI: 1.07-37.47) had a poor prognosis. Among patients with SMARCA4-dNSCLC who were treated and had distant metastases (stage IV), male patients and patients treated with immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy showed a longer median overall survival (mOS).
CONCLUSION: SMARCA4-dNSCLC has unique clinicopathological features and a shorter survival prognosis than SMARCA4-iNSCLC. The efficacy of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy needs to be observed for longer periods.
METHODS: We selected 105 patients with SMARCA4-dNSCLC and 221 patients with SMARCA4-intact non-small cell lung cancer (SMARCA4-iNSCLC) by performing immunohistochemical analysis of 1520 NSCLC samples, and we assessed the patients' clinicopathological features and survival state.
RESULTS: (1) SMARCA4-dNSCLC was significantly associated with older age, male sex, smoking history, larger invasive tumor size, higher tumor proliferation index (Ki-67), more adrenal metastases, more lymph node metastases, and few EGFR mutations (p < 0.05). The tumors were mostly negative for thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1), CD34, and p40 and positive for cytokeratin 7 (CK7) in immunohistochemistry (IHC). Nineteen SMARCA4-dNSCLC patients mostly had TP53, SMARCA4, and LRP1B mutations, and 48% of them had SMARCA4 frameshift mutations. SMARCA4-dNSCLC patients have a worse prognosis than SMARCA4-iNSCLC patients (HR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.17-0.45). The overall survival (OS) of patients with stage III SMARCA4-dNSCLC was worse than that of patients with SMARCA4-iNSCLC, and the OS of stage IV SMARCA4-dNSCLC patients was also worse than that of SMARCA4-iNSCLC patients (p < 0.01). (2) Multivariate regression analysis showed that sex (HR: 4.12; 95% CI: 1.03-16.39) and smoking history (HR: 2.29; 95% CI: 1.04-5.02) had significant effects on the survival time of SMARCA4-dNSCLC patients. In SMARCA4-dNSCLC patients without distant metastases (stage I-III), patients with stage N2 or N3 lymph node metastases (HR: 6.35; 95% CI: 1.07-37.47) had a poor prognosis. Among patients with SMARCA4-dNSCLC who were treated and had distant metastases (stage IV), male patients and patients treated with immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy showed a longer median overall survival (mOS).
CONCLUSION: SMARCA4-dNSCLC has unique clinicopathological features and a shorter survival prognosis than SMARCA4-iNSCLC. The efficacy of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy needs to be observed for longer periods.