MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.otohns.2003.09.024

Медицинская библиотека · Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2004

Radiofrequency ablation versus electrocautery in tonsillectomy.

Hall Daniel J, Littlefield Philip D, Birkmire-Peters Deborah P, Holtel Michael R

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to compare the safety, difficulty of removal, and postoperative pain profile of radiofrequency ablation versus standard electrocautery removal of tonsils.

STUDY DESIGN AND

SETTING

A prospective, blinded study was designed to remove 1 tonsil with each of the 2 methods. Time of operation, estimated blood loss, difficulty of operation, postoperative pain, rate of postoperative hemorrhage, and the patient's preferred technique were evaluated.

RESULTS

The operating time was significantly longer (P < 0.007) and the patients reported significantly less pain (P < 0.001) with radiofrequency ablation. There were no differences in blood loss, difficulty of operation, or postoperative hemorrhage rates. The patients preferred the radiofrequency ablation technique (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Radiofrequency ablation is a viable method to remove tonsillar tissue. Operating time for this procedure will likely decrease with experience. There was significantly less pain reported with radiofrequency ablation compared with standard electrocautery.

Для цитирования: Hall Daniel J, Littlefield Philip D, Birkmire-Peters Deborah P, Holtel Michael R. Radiofrequency ablation versus electrocautery in tonsillectomy.. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2003.09.024.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.