Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2009
Impact of patient setup error in the treatment of head and neck cancer with intensity modulated radiation therapy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Prabhakar Ramachandran, Laviraj Macherla A, Haresh Kunhi Parambath, Julka Pramod K, Rath Goura K
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To study the impact of setup errors on the dose to the target volume and critical structures in the treatment of cancer of nasopharynx with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twelve patients of carcinoma of nasopharynx treated by IMRT with simultaneous integrated boost technique were enrolled. The gross tumor volume, clinical target volume and low-risk nodal region were planned for 70, 59.4 and 54 Gy, respectively, in 33 fractions. Based on the constraints, treatment plans were generated. Keeping it as the base plan, the patient setup error was simulated for 3, 5 and 10mm by shifting the isocenter in all three directions viz. anterior, posterior, superior, inferior, right and left lateral. The plans were evaluated for mean dose, maximum dose, volume of PTV receiving >110% and <93% of the prescribed dose. For both the parotids, the mean dose and the dose received by >50% of the parotid were evaluated. The maximum dose and dose received by 2 cc of spinal cord were also analyzed.
RESULTS: The dose to the target volume decreases gradually with increase in setup error. The superior and inferior shifts play major role in tumor under-dosage. A setup error of 3mm along the posterior and lateral directions significantly affects the dose to the spinal cord. Similarly, setup error along lateral and anterior directions affects the dose to both parotids.
CONCLUSIONS: The isocenter position should be verified regularly to ensure that the goal of IMRT is achieved.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twelve patients of carcinoma of nasopharynx treated by IMRT with simultaneous integrated boost technique were enrolled. The gross tumor volume, clinical target volume and low-risk nodal region were planned for 70, 59.4 and 54 Gy, respectively, in 33 fractions. Based on the constraints, treatment plans were generated. Keeping it as the base plan, the patient setup error was simulated for 3, 5 and 10mm by shifting the isocenter in all three directions viz. anterior, posterior, superior, inferior, right and left lateral. The plans were evaluated for mean dose, maximum dose, volume of PTV receiving >110% and <93% of the prescribed dose. For both the parotids, the mean dose and the dose received by >50% of the parotid were evaluated. The maximum dose and dose received by 2 cc of spinal cord were also analyzed.
RESULTS: The dose to the target volume decreases gradually with increase in setup error. The superior and inferior shifts play major role in tumor under-dosage. A setup error of 3mm along the posterior and lateral directions significantly affects the dose to the spinal cord. Similarly, setup error along lateral and anterior directions affects the dose to both parotids.
CONCLUSIONS: The isocenter position should be verified regularly to ensure that the goal of IMRT is achieved.