MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1155/2015/879584

Медицинская библиотека · Case reports in urology · 2015

Prostatic Stromal Tumor of Uncertain Malignant Potential Which Was Difficult to Diagnose.

Matsuyama Satoko, Nohara Takahiro, Kawaguchi Shohei, Seto Chikashi, Nakanishi Yuko, Uchiyama Akio, Ishizawa Shin

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Here, we report a case of stromal tumor of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) that was difficult to diagnose. A 53-year-old male was found to have a hard nodule on digital rectal examination; magnetic resonance imaging revealed a large nodule on the left side of the prostate, indicating prostate cancer. However, pathological diagnosis of the biopsy specimen was benign prostatic hyperplasia. Although a papillary tumor in the prostatic urethra was also seen on urethrocystoscopy, the tumor specimen obtained from transurethral resection was not malignant. The tumor in the prostatic urethra recurred only 3 months after transurethral resection, and pathological findings revealed benign hyperplasia not only in the stromal tissue but also in the epithelium; therefore, the prostate tumor was suspected to be STUMP. It took many prostate pathologists a long time to reach the final diagnosis of STUMP. STUMP is a rare benign tumor, difficult to diagnose, and sometimes transforms into stromal sarcoma. Thus, we should consider radical resection in such cases.

Для цитирования: Matsuyama Satoko, Nohara Takahiro, Kawaguchi Shohei, Seto Chikashi, Nakanishi Yuko, Uchiyama Akio, Ishizawa Shin. Prostatic Stromal Tumor of Uncertain Malignant Potential Which Was Difficult to Diagnose.. Case reports in urology. 2015. DOI: 10.1155/2015/879584.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.