Current opinion in gastroenterology · 2025
A review of techniques of third space endoscopy for gastrointestinal tumors.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nabi Zaheer, Reddy D Nageshwar
Аннотация
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review explores the evolving landscape of third-space endoscopy (TSE) techniques for the management of gastrointestinal (GI) tumors. With rapid technological advances and accumulating evidence, there is a pressing need to synthesize current knowledge and clarify the comparative utility of approaches like submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) and tunneling endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).
RECENT FINDINGS: STER is safe and effective for resection of subepithelial lesions, offering mucosal preservation, high en bloc resection rates, and reduced recovery time compared to ESE, ESD, and endoscopic full-thickness resection. Piecemeal STER is a potential alternative to surgery in managing large esophageal sub-epithelial lesions without compromising outcomes. For early epithelial neoplasms, pocket-creation and tunneling variants of ESD improve dissection speed and reduce adverse events, especially in large lesions. Comparative studies across esophagus, stomach, and colon confirm these benefits. Additionally, risk scoring systems and resection algorithms may guide personalized technique selection.
SUMMARY: STER and tunneling ESD represent significant advances in minimally invasive management of GI tumors. Incorporating these techniques into practice can enhance safety and efficacy, especially when guided by risk stratification tools. Ongoing innovation, including artificial intelligence and robotics, is likely to further refine third-space interventions in near future.
RECENT FINDINGS: STER is safe and effective for resection of subepithelial lesions, offering mucosal preservation, high en bloc resection rates, and reduced recovery time compared to ESE, ESD, and endoscopic full-thickness resection. Piecemeal STER is a potential alternative to surgery in managing large esophageal sub-epithelial lesions without compromising outcomes. For early epithelial neoplasms, pocket-creation and tunneling variants of ESD improve dissection speed and reduce adverse events, especially in large lesions. Comparative studies across esophagus, stomach, and colon confirm these benefits. Additionally, risk scoring systems and resection algorithms may guide personalized technique selection.
SUMMARY: STER and tunneling ESD represent significant advances in minimally invasive management of GI tumors. Incorporating these techniques into practice can enhance safety and efficacy, especially when guided by risk stratification tools. Ongoing innovation, including artificial intelligence and robotics, is likely to further refine third-space interventions in near future.