MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0890-6238(02)00025-4

Медицинская библиотека · Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) · 2002

Impact of diurnal scrotal temperature on semen quality.

Hjollund Niels Henrik I, Storgaard Lone, Ernst Erik, Bonde Jens Peter, Olsen Jørn

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A high scrotal temperature is a common finding in infertile patients and experimental studies indicate that specific types of heat exposure reduce semen quality. More and more men have a sedentary work position, which increases scrotal temperature. Semen and blood samples from 99 healthy men were analysed in relation to scrotal skin temperature obtained by a 24-h continuous monitoring protocol. Information on sedentary position at work and during spare time was collected by questionnaires. A negative correlation was found between high scrotal temperature and sperm output. Sperm concentration decreased 40% per 1 degrees C increment of median daytime scrotal temperature (95% CI: 8-71%). Similar results were found for total sperm count, FSH, and inhibin B. Motility, morphology, pH, and testosterone were not significantly associated with temperature. Only weak and inconsistent associations were found between sedentary position and semen quality. We conclude that scrotal temperature and semen quality are closely associated. Sedentary work position encountered in ordinary jobs, although a strong determinant of scrotal temperature, does not seem to have any effect on semen quality.

Для цитирования: Hjollund Niels Henrik I, Storgaard Lone, Ernst Erik, Bonde Jens Peter, Olsen Jørn. Impact of diurnal scrotal temperature on semen quality.. Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.). 2002. DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6238(02)00025-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.