Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2015
The challenge of preoperative identification of uterine myomas: Is ultrasound trustworthy? A prospective cohort study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Battista Cleonice, Capriglione Stella, Guzzo Federica, Luvero Daniela, Sadun Beniamino, Cafà Ester Valentina, Sereni Maria Isabella, Terranova Corrado, Plotti Francesco, Angioli Roberto
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To correlate preoperative ultrasound examination with intraoperative and anatomo-pathological findings, including estimation of number, localization and size of uterine myomas, uterine diameters and volume.
METHODS: A prospective study on 126 women undergoing surgery for uterine myomatosis at Campus Bio-medico between May 2013 and April 2014. The patients were divided into two groups: one submitted to hysterectomy and the other submitted to open myomectomy. Ultrasound scans were performed 1 day before surgery by the same expert sonographer. The number of myomas at ultrasound was compared to intraoperative visualization and anatomo-pathological findings. Wilcoxon Test was applied to compare data registered with each technique.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the number of myomas recorded at visualization and at ultrasound, while there was a significant difference between visualization and anatomo-pathology (p = 0.0006). The analysis showed a non-significant difference between myoma number at ultrasound and at anatomo-pathology in the two groups, if the number of myomas was less than or equal to six. Contrarily, we observed a significant difference if the number of myomas was more than six (p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that ultrasound has limits in identifying the exact number of uterine myomas. This mapping is particularly needed in a minority of patients with usually desiring fertility who need a debulking procedure due to the large size and/or number of myomas or myoma location causing symptomatology. In patients with more than six myomas, voluminous uterus, a second-level examination such as Magnetic Resonance may be helpful.
METHODS: A prospective study on 126 women undergoing surgery for uterine myomatosis at Campus Bio-medico between May 2013 and April 2014. The patients were divided into two groups: one submitted to hysterectomy and the other submitted to open myomectomy. Ultrasound scans were performed 1 day before surgery by the same expert sonographer. The number of myomas at ultrasound was compared to intraoperative visualization and anatomo-pathological findings. Wilcoxon Test was applied to compare data registered with each technique.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the number of myomas recorded at visualization and at ultrasound, while there was a significant difference between visualization and anatomo-pathology (p = 0.0006). The analysis showed a non-significant difference between myoma number at ultrasound and at anatomo-pathology in the two groups, if the number of myomas was less than or equal to six. Contrarily, we observed a significant difference if the number of myomas was more than six (p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that ultrasound has limits in identifying the exact number of uterine myomas. This mapping is particularly needed in a minority of patients with usually desiring fertility who need a debulking procedure due to the large size and/or number of myomas or myoma location causing symptomatology. In patients with more than six myomas, voluminous uterus, a second-level examination such as Magnetic Resonance may be helpful.