Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2015
Facilitating retroflexed endoscopic full-thickness resection through loop-mediated or rope-mediated countertraction (with videos).
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАVideo-Audio MediaНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lu Jiaoyang, Jiao Taotao, Li Yanmei, Zheng Minhua, Lu Xuefeng
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is difficult to perform in a retroflexed fashion in the gastric fundus and lesser curvature. Here we describe two simple methods to provide countertraction and thereby facilitate dissection.
METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 62 patients diagnosed as having gastric submucosal tumors in the fundus or in the lesser curvature received EFTR with or without countertraction methods. For the clip-with-thread method, a clip tied with surgical suture was anchored on the distal edge of the tumor to provide countertraction; for the loop-assisted method, a snare placed on the transparent cap beforehand was adopted to grasp the tumor to provide countertraction.
RESULTS: Mean operative time was significantly reduced in the thread-with-clip group and loop-assisted group (45 minutes, 40 minutes, respectively) compared with the time needed in the traditional EFTR group (85 minutes). Intraoperative pneumoperitoneum occurred regularly among the 3 groups because of iatrogenic perforation, but fewer patients in the thread-with-clip group and loop-assisted group (23%, 18%, respectively) needed abdominal puncture to relieve free air and stabilize life signs compared with patients in the traditional EFTR group (63%). A reduced occurrence of high fever after surgery may contribute as another advantage from accelerated dissection. Both techniques did not jeopardize oncologic safety during short-term follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Both the thread-with-clip method and loop-assisted method provide effective countertraction and offer faster and safer gastric EFTR in difficult anatomic locations.
METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 62 patients diagnosed as having gastric submucosal tumors in the fundus or in the lesser curvature received EFTR with or without countertraction methods. For the clip-with-thread method, a clip tied with surgical suture was anchored on the distal edge of the tumor to provide countertraction; for the loop-assisted method, a snare placed on the transparent cap beforehand was adopted to grasp the tumor to provide countertraction.
RESULTS: Mean operative time was significantly reduced in the thread-with-clip group and loop-assisted group (45 minutes, 40 minutes, respectively) compared with the time needed in the traditional EFTR group (85 minutes). Intraoperative pneumoperitoneum occurred regularly among the 3 groups because of iatrogenic perforation, but fewer patients in the thread-with-clip group and loop-assisted group (23%, 18%, respectively) needed abdominal puncture to relieve free air and stabilize life signs compared with patients in the traditional EFTR group (63%). A reduced occurrence of high fever after surgery may contribute as another advantage from accelerated dissection. Both techniques did not jeopardize oncologic safety during short-term follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Both the thread-with-clip method and loop-assisted method provide effective countertraction and offer faster and safer gastric EFTR in difficult anatomic locations.