American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2011
A novel optical method to assess cervical changes during pregnancy and use to evaluate the effects of progestins on term and preterm labor.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kuon Ruben J, Shi Shao-Qing, Maul Holger, Sohn Christof, Balducci James, Shi Leili, Garfield Robert E
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether optical methods can estimate cervix function during pregnancy and whether progestins modify this process.
STUDY DESIGN: Photos of the external cervix of timed-pregnant rats were taken every other day from day 13 until postpartum day 5 after daily treatments with vehicle (controls) or progestin treatments (progesterone, subcutaneously or vaginally; 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate [17P] and RU-486 subcutaneously, once on day 16). The surface area of the cervix was estimated from photos.
RESULTS: The surface area of cervix increases throughout pregnancy and reverses after delivery in controls. In the progesterone subcutaneously or 17P subcutaneously groups, increases in surface area are lower (17P group until day 19 only; P < .05). Vaginal progesterone does not prevent surface area increases. Only the progesterone subcutaneously blocked delivery. RU-486 increases the surface area of the cervix (P < .05) during preterm delivery.
CONCLUSION: An optical method is useful for quantitative assessment of the cervix and evaluation of agents that modify cervical function.
STUDY DESIGN: Photos of the external cervix of timed-pregnant rats were taken every other day from day 13 until postpartum day 5 after daily treatments with vehicle (controls) or progestin treatments (progesterone, subcutaneously or vaginally; 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate [17P] and RU-486 subcutaneously, once on day 16). The surface area of the cervix was estimated from photos.
RESULTS: The surface area of cervix increases throughout pregnancy and reverses after delivery in controls. In the progesterone subcutaneously or 17P subcutaneously groups, increases in surface area are lower (17P group until day 19 only; P < .05). Vaginal progesterone does not prevent surface area increases. Only the progesterone subcutaneously blocked delivery. RU-486 increases the surface area of the cervix (P < .05) during preterm delivery.
CONCLUSION: An optical method is useful for quantitative assessment of the cervix and evaluation of agents that modify cervical function.