MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015

CYP1A1 genetic polymorphisms and uterine leiomyoma risk: a meta-analysis.

Wang Fen, Chen Jiying, Wang Lin, Ma Yulan, Mayinuer Niyazi

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Some studies assessed the association between CYP1A1 MspI and Ile462Val polymorphisms and uterine leiomyoma (UL) risk. However, the results were controversial. We did this meta-analysis to determine the association between CYP1A1 MspI and Ile462Val polymorphisms and UL risk.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

We searched databases containing PubMed, Springer Link, EMBASE, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) up to 11 October 2014. Pooled ORs and 95% CIs were used to assess the strength of the associations.

RESULTS

In total, 9 case-control studies with 2157 UL cases and 2197 healthy controls were included in this meta-analysis. CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism was significantly associated with UL risk (OR = 2.29, 95% CI 1.75-2.99, P < 0.00001). In the subgroup analysis by race, significantly increased risks were found in the Asians (OR = 2.76, 95% CI 1.86-4.09, P < 0.00001) and Caucasians (OR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.30-2.68, P = 0.0007). However, MspI polymorphism was not significantly associated with UL risk (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 0.90-1.47, P = 0.27). In the subgroup analysis by race, no significant association was found in the Asians (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 0.86-1.54, P = 0.35).

CONCLUSION

In summary, the results of the meta-analysis suggested that CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism was significantly associated with UL risk.

Для цитирования: Wang Fen, Chen Jiying, Wang Lin, Ma Yulan, Mayinuer Niyazi. CYP1A1 genetic polymorphisms and uterine leiomyoma risk: a meta-analysis.. International journal of clinical and experimental medicine. 2015.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.