[Zhonghua yan ke za zhi] Chinese journal of ophthalmology · 2012
[The clinical observation of conjunctivochalasis crescent conjunctival resection with bipolar coagulation].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jiang Li-hong, Zhang Xing-ru, Zhang Jing-hua, Ying Jian, Shi Chun, Li Qing-song
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To seek safe, effective, economical, simple treatment conjunctivochalasis surgical methods, optimize treatment, evaluation conjunctivochalasis surgical treatment.
METHODS: A prospective randomized control study, 60 patients (60 eyes) conjunctivochalasis surgery patients were randomly divided into two groups, one line of bipolar coagulation therapy, another group of crescent conjunctival resection. After comparing the two surgical methods ocular surface disease index (OSDI) points, the degree of relaxation conjunctiva, tear meniscus height, BUT, surgical complications, the operation time to evaluate the two kinds of surgical methods of clinical efficacy.
RESULTS: Bipolar coagulation therapy with crescent conjunctival resection in 8 weeks after the OSDI points, loose conjunctiva residual points, tear meniscus, BUT the difference was not statistically significant. 8 weeks after bipolar coagulation complications points lower than the crescent conjunctival resection is low, the difference was statistically significant (t = 4.67, P = 0.029); bipolar coagulation operating time (9.53 ± 3.15) min crescent than conjunctival resection time (18.59 ± 7.68) min short, the difference was statistically significant (t = 13.26, P > 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Conjunctivochalasis line bipolar coagulation and removal of loose conjunctiva crescent with considerable effect, bipolar coagulation was significantly shorter operative time, a significant reduction in postoperative complications, surgical procedures easier.
METHODS: A prospective randomized control study, 60 patients (60 eyes) conjunctivochalasis surgery patients were randomly divided into two groups, one line of bipolar coagulation therapy, another group of crescent conjunctival resection. After comparing the two surgical methods ocular surface disease index (OSDI) points, the degree of relaxation conjunctiva, tear meniscus height, BUT, surgical complications, the operation time to evaluate the two kinds of surgical methods of clinical efficacy.
RESULTS: Bipolar coagulation therapy with crescent conjunctival resection in 8 weeks after the OSDI points, loose conjunctiva residual points, tear meniscus, BUT the difference was not statistically significant. 8 weeks after bipolar coagulation complications points lower than the crescent conjunctival resection is low, the difference was statistically significant (t = 4.67, P = 0.029); bipolar coagulation operating time (9.53 ± 3.15) min crescent than conjunctival resection time (18.59 ± 7.68) min short, the difference was statistically significant (t = 13.26, P > 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Conjunctivochalasis line bipolar coagulation and removal of loose conjunctiva crescent with considerable effect, bipolar coagulation was significantly shorter operative time, a significant reduction in postoperative complications, surgical procedures easier.