The Journal of nutrition · 2025
The Relation Between Carotenoids Measured in the Skin and Eye.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Smith Spencer F, Renzi-Hammond Lisa M, Harth Jacob B, Hammond Billy R
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Carotenoid amounts measured in the skin and retina are increasingly being used as biomarkers of general health, function, and disease. However, whether they are directly interchangeable is not clear. Several previous studies comparing the measures in adults and children have found inconsistent results.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this observational study is to assess the relation between carotenoid amounts measured in the skin and retina.
METHODS: We assessed the relation between the 2 measurements over an extended period and multiple testing sessions; 21 healthy participants were assessed (mean age, 27.0 y; SD, 9.8 y). Macular carotenoids were measured using a standard method based on customized heterochromatic flicker photometry. Skin carotenoids were measured using pressure-mediated reflection spectroscopy.
RESULTS: Both retinal and skin measures showed high reliability (intraclass correlations > 0.90) and stability over time. The 2 measures, when averaged over 5 testing sessions, were moderately but significantly correlated (r = 0.55; P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Skin carotenoid amounts accounted for approximately a third of the variance in retinal carotenoid density. Carotenoids in both skin and retina likely share many factors that both promote and interfere with accumulation. Each, however, also likely has some unique predictive characteristics as a biomarker. Therefore, when using physiologic carotenoids as a biomarker, the outcome of interest should determine whether to measure carotenoids dermally or in the retina.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this observational study is to assess the relation between carotenoid amounts measured in the skin and retina.
METHODS: We assessed the relation between the 2 measurements over an extended period and multiple testing sessions; 21 healthy participants were assessed (mean age, 27.0 y; SD, 9.8 y). Macular carotenoids were measured using a standard method based on customized heterochromatic flicker photometry. Skin carotenoids were measured using pressure-mediated reflection spectroscopy.
RESULTS: Both retinal and skin measures showed high reliability (intraclass correlations > 0.90) and stability over time. The 2 measures, when averaged over 5 testing sessions, were moderately but significantly correlated (r = 0.55; P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Skin carotenoid amounts accounted for approximately a third of the variance in retinal carotenoid density. Carotenoids in both skin and retina likely share many factors that both promote and interfere with accumulation. Each, however, also likely has some unique predictive characteristics as a biomarker. Therefore, when using physiologic carotenoids as a biomarker, the outcome of interest should determine whether to measure carotenoids dermally or in the retina.