Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
Impact of reduced interval from simulation CT to treatment delivery on dosimetric and positioning accuracy for total marrow lymph-node irradiation.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dei Damiano, Lambri Nicola, Sopranzi Claudia, Galdieri Carmela, Franzese Ciro, Scorsetti Marta, Mancosu Pietro
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Total marrow (lymph-node) irradiation (TMI/TMLI) is designed to minimize toxicities of conventional total body irradiation in hematopoietic stem cell transplant conditioning. Planning typically relies on a computed tomography (CT) scan acquired many days before treatment (e.g. 15 days; CT-15) to allow time for plan optimization. However, anatomical changes during this interval, influenced by patient condition and concurrent therapies, can compromise dosimetric accuracy. This study evaluates the impact of shortening the CT-to-treatment timeframe to 4 days (CT-4) on dosimetric and positioning accuracy in TMI/TMLI.
METHODS: Eighteen patients were enrolled in this prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04976205). Treatment plans, optimized with a multi-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy on CT-15, were recalculated on CT‑4 to assess changes in planning target volume (PTV) dose coverage (PTV_D98%). Image matching quality between CT-15/CT‑4 and cone-beam CT acquisitions was assessed with a scale of 1 to 5. Wilcoxon signed-rank test with significance set at p < 0.05 was considered.
RESULTS: A significant reduction in median PTV_D98% was found between CT-15 (98.0%, minimum/maximum [98.0, 98.0]%) and CT‑4 (92.2%, [62.9, 98.9]%). Image matching quality improved in 72% of patients using CT‑4 compared to CT-15. In 11% of cases, relevant discrepancies required re-optimization using CT‑4.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the benefits of a shorter CT-to-treatment timeframe for improving dosimetric and positioning accuracy in TMI/TMLI. Automated planning tools may further enhance TMI/TMLI workflows, particularly for patients undergoing intensive conditioning protocols.
METHODS: Eighteen patients were enrolled in this prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04976205). Treatment plans, optimized with a multi-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy on CT-15, were recalculated on CT‑4 to assess changes in planning target volume (PTV) dose coverage (PTV_D98%). Image matching quality between CT-15/CT‑4 and cone-beam CT acquisitions was assessed with a scale of 1 to 5. Wilcoxon signed-rank test with significance set at p < 0.05 was considered.
RESULTS: A significant reduction in median PTV_D98% was found between CT-15 (98.0%, minimum/maximum [98.0, 98.0]%) and CT‑4 (92.2%, [62.9, 98.9]%). Image matching quality improved in 72% of patients using CT‑4 compared to CT-15. In 11% of cases, relevant discrepancies required re-optimization using CT‑4.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the benefits of a shorter CT-to-treatment timeframe for improving dosimetric and positioning accuracy in TMI/TMLI. Automated planning tools may further enhance TMI/TMLI workflows, particularly for patients undergoing intensive conditioning protocols.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedFemaleMaleProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedMiddle AgedAdultRadiotherapy DosageWhole-Body IrradiationBone MarrowLymph NodesPatient PositioningAgedHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLymphatic IrradiationTime FactorsTransplantation Conditioning