Eye & contact lens · 2015
Contact Lens-Related Acanthamoeba Keratitis and Accompanying Dacryoadenitis.
Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sengor Tomris, Kurna Sevda A, Altun Ahmet, Irkec Murat, Aki Suat F, Aksoy Sibel
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: In this study, by presenting four cases, we aimed to discuss the clinical presentation, diagnosis, therapy, and methods for prevention of Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) and to emphasize that inflammatory dacryoadenitis can be seen together with it.
METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of four eyes of four wearers of hydrophilic soft contact lenses who developed AK. The diagnosis was based on clinical signs, disease course, and confocal microscopy results. In cases with dacryoadenitis, in addition to clinical findings, magnetic resonance imaging was used to establish the diagnosis.
RESULTS: All of the cases were using their contact lenses without supervision of an ophthalmologist under inappropriate conditions such as swimming in a pool and during steam bath. The diagnosis was established, and the treatment was performed within the standard protocol for AK. Two of the patients had low visual acuity at the level of counting fingers with corneal scar, cataract, and glaucoma, whereas the other two healed with fewer complications and achieved better vision. Two of the 4 cases (50%) presented with dacryoadenitis accompanying the AK. Lacrimal gland swelling improved in conjunction with symptoms of keratitis without specific treatment for dacryoadenitis in these two cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the improvements in diagnostic tests and treatment strategies for AK, the role of prevention becomes apparent because of the bad prognosis of this serious complication; thus, contact lens wearers should be aware of the importance of using lenses under ophthalmologist's supervision. In addition, we would like to emphasize that AK may be frequently associated with lacrimal gland inflammation.
METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of four eyes of four wearers of hydrophilic soft contact lenses who developed AK. The diagnosis was based on clinical signs, disease course, and confocal microscopy results. In cases with dacryoadenitis, in addition to clinical findings, magnetic resonance imaging was used to establish the diagnosis.
RESULTS: All of the cases were using their contact lenses without supervision of an ophthalmologist under inappropriate conditions such as swimming in a pool and during steam bath. The diagnosis was established, and the treatment was performed within the standard protocol for AK. Two of the patients had low visual acuity at the level of counting fingers with corneal scar, cataract, and glaucoma, whereas the other two healed with fewer complications and achieved better vision. Two of the 4 cases (50%) presented with dacryoadenitis accompanying the AK. Lacrimal gland swelling improved in conjunction with symptoms of keratitis without specific treatment for dacryoadenitis in these two cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the improvements in diagnostic tests and treatment strategies for AK, the role of prevention becomes apparent because of the bad prognosis of this serious complication; thus, contact lens wearers should be aware of the importance of using lenses under ophthalmologist's supervision. In addition, we would like to emphasize that AK may be frequently associated with lacrimal gland inflammation.