The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2021
Cost analysis of four types of surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse in a Japanese population.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Myoga Mai, Sho Tomoko, Aoki Hitomi, Ishizuka Takaki, Nakajima Daisuke, Yoshimura Kazuaki
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To compare the perioperative costs analysis between laparoscopic/transvaginal and the mesh/non-mesh surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in Japan.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 2013 to April 2017, 890 patients who underwent POP surgeries were enrolled in this study. Regarding transvaginal native tissue repair (TV-NTR: transvaginal hysterectomy with colpocleisis), transvaginal mesh surgery (TVM), laparoscopic native tissue repair (L-NTR: laparoscopic hysterectomy and uterosacral ligament colposuspension), and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC), a retrospective observational study was performed. Patients' age, operation time, blood loss, perioperative complications, length of hospital stay, pre-/postoperative quality of life (QOL) scores, were reviewed from the medical records. The net income, which was calculated by using the income (the operation/anesthesia fee) and the costs (the labor and consumables costs for operation/anesthesia), was evaluated.
RESULTS: The operation fees of the L-NTR ($4250) and the LSC ($4833) groups were higher than that of the TV-NTR ($2652) and the TVM ($2913) groups. The labor costs and consumables costs of operation were higher in the LSC ($1589) and the L-NTR ($1500) groups than the TV-NTR ($180) and the TVM ($178) groups. The consumables costs for anesthesia in the four groups were equal. The operation hours were significantly shorter in the TV-NTR and the TVM groups than the L-NTR and the LSC groups.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that TVM operation was an economically excellent and the most efficient POP operation with shorter operation time and less consumables.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 2013 to April 2017, 890 patients who underwent POP surgeries were enrolled in this study. Regarding transvaginal native tissue repair (TV-NTR: transvaginal hysterectomy with colpocleisis), transvaginal mesh surgery (TVM), laparoscopic native tissue repair (L-NTR: laparoscopic hysterectomy and uterosacral ligament colposuspension), and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC), a retrospective observational study was performed. Patients' age, operation time, blood loss, perioperative complications, length of hospital stay, pre-/postoperative quality of life (QOL) scores, were reviewed from the medical records. The net income, which was calculated by using the income (the operation/anesthesia fee) and the costs (the labor and consumables costs for operation/anesthesia), was evaluated.
RESULTS: The operation fees of the L-NTR ($4250) and the LSC ($4833) groups were higher than that of the TV-NTR ($2652) and the TVM ($2913) groups. The labor costs and consumables costs of operation were higher in the LSC ($1589) and the L-NTR ($1500) groups than the TV-NTR ($180) and the TVM ($178) groups. The consumables costs for anesthesia in the four groups were equal. The operation hours were significantly shorter in the TV-NTR and the TVM groups than the L-NTR and the LSC groups.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that TVM operation was an economically excellent and the most efficient POP operation with shorter operation time and less consumables.