MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106828

Медицинская библиотека · Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2022

Effective active learning in digital pathology: A case study in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes.

Meirelles André Ls, Kurc Tahsin, Saltz Joel, Teodoro George

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE

Deep learning methods have demonstrated remarkable performance in pathology image analysis, but they require a large amount of annotated training data from expert pathologists. The aim of this study is to minimize the data annotation need in these analyses.

METHODS

Active learning (AL) is an iterative approach to training deep learning models. It was used in our context with a Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TIL) classification task to minimize annotation. State-of-the-art AL methods were evaluated with the TIL application and we have proposed and evaluated a more efficient and effective AL acquisition method. The proposed method uses data grouping based on imaging features and model prediction uncertainty to select meaningful training samples (image patches).

RESULTS

An experimental evaluation with a collection of cancer tissue images shows that: (i) Our approach reduces the number of patches required to attain a given AUC as compared to other approaches, and (ii) our optimization (subpooling) leads to AL execution time improvement of about 2.12×.

CONCLUSIONS

This strategy enabled TIL based deep learning analyses using smaller annotation demand. We expect this approach may be used to build other analyses in digital pathology with fewer training samples.

Для цитирования: Meirelles André Ls, Kurc Tahsin, Saltz Joel, Teodoro George. Effective active learning in digital pathology: A case study in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes.. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106828.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.