Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2004
The difficult MESA: findings from tubuli recti sperm aspiration.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zenke Ulrike, Jalalian Liza, Shen Shehua, Turek Paul J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate sperm quality aspirated from the tubuli recti compared to that obtained from microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA).
METHODS: Sixteen patients with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD) underwent MESA. Six MESA procedures were difficult, and therefore sperm were retrieved from the tubuli recti ductules. Intraoperative sperm parameters, recovery after freeze-thaw, and ICSI outcomes were analyzed and compared between tubuli recti and MESA sperm.
RESULTS: Mean initial sperm concentration was similar in both groups (18 vs. 16 million sperm/mL). Initial sperm motility was significantly higher in the tubuli recti group (35%) than the MESA group (25%). However, post thaw motility was higher with MESA compared to tubuli recti sperm (8.7 vs. 1.5%). ICSI fertilization rates after sperm freeze-thaw were 66% for tubuli recti sperm and 71% for MESA sperm.
CONCLUSIONS: Tubuli recti sperm may provide an attractive alternative to testis sperm extraction. Poor sperm recovery after freeze-thaw should be expected.
METHODS: Sixteen patients with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD) underwent MESA. Six MESA procedures were difficult, and therefore sperm were retrieved from the tubuli recti ductules. Intraoperative sperm parameters, recovery after freeze-thaw, and ICSI outcomes were analyzed and compared between tubuli recti and MESA sperm.
RESULTS: Mean initial sperm concentration was similar in both groups (18 vs. 16 million sperm/mL). Initial sperm motility was significantly higher in the tubuli recti group (35%) than the MESA group (25%). However, post thaw motility was higher with MESA compared to tubuli recti sperm (8.7 vs. 1.5%). ICSI fertilization rates after sperm freeze-thaw were 66% for tubuli recti sperm and 71% for MESA sperm.
CONCLUSIONS: Tubuli recti sperm may provide an attractive alternative to testis sperm extraction. Poor sperm recovery after freeze-thaw should be expected.