Puerto Rico health sciences journal · 2015
Epiploic Appendagitis, an Uncommon Cause of Abdominal Pain: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.
СтатьяПоддержка правительства СШАОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ortega-Cruz Hiram D, Martínez-Souss Jaime, Acosta-Pumarejo Eduardo, Toro Doris H
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Epiploic appendagitis (EA) is a rare entity caused by the inflammation of the appendix epiploica. It is a benign and self-limited condition presenting as acute onset abdominal pain. The inaccurate diagnosis of EA can lead to unnecessary hospitalization, antibiotic therapy, and surgery. Our aim is to describe the common clinical features of patients who were diagnosed with EA over a 2-year period at the San Juan Veterans Administration Hospital.
METHODS: A retrospective descriptive review of the records of all patients diagnosed with EA from 2007 to 2009. The clinical data was obtained through record review. Diagnoses were confirmed by 2 radiologists reviewing imaging studies.
RESULTS: Eight patients were included in the study. All were male with a mean age of 58 years. Seven patients were overweight as per body mass index (BMI) scale. All had localized focal, non-migratory abdominal pain, most (75%) in the left lower quadrant. Nausea (37.5%), anorexia (12.5%), constipation (12.5%), and diarrhea (25%) were documented as well. Only 2 patients demonstrated mild elevations in WBC, but none of the 8 had a fever. During the study period, all the patients' symptoms resolved without documented recurrence.
CONCLUSION: In our small case series, overweight was a common finding, supporting the described association between EA and obesity. History and physical exam should prompt the clinician to consider EA in the differential diagnosis of acute abdominal pain, particularly in those who are obese and who have pain localized to the left lower quadrant.
METHODS: A retrospective descriptive review of the records of all patients diagnosed with EA from 2007 to 2009. The clinical data was obtained through record review. Diagnoses were confirmed by 2 radiologists reviewing imaging studies.
RESULTS: Eight patients were included in the study. All were male with a mean age of 58 years. Seven patients were overweight as per body mass index (BMI) scale. All had localized focal, non-migratory abdominal pain, most (75%) in the left lower quadrant. Nausea (37.5%), anorexia (12.5%), constipation (12.5%), and diarrhea (25%) were documented as well. Only 2 patients demonstrated mild elevations in WBC, but none of the 8 had a fever. During the study period, all the patients' symptoms resolved without documented recurrence.
CONCLUSION: In our small case series, overweight was a common finding, supporting the described association between EA and obesity. History and physical exam should prompt the clinician to consider EA in the differential diagnosis of acute abdominal pain, particularly in those who are obese and who have pain localized to the left lower quadrant.