Response characteristics for thermal and pressure devices commonly used for monitoring nasal and oral airflow during sleep studies.

We examined thermocouple and pressure cannulae responses to oral and nasal airflow using a polyester model of a human face, with patent nasal and oral orifices instrumented with a dual thermocouple (F-ONT2A, Grass) or a dual cannula (0588, Braebon) pressure transducer (± 10 cm H2O, Celesco) system. Tidal airflow was generated using a dual compartment facemask with pneumotachographs (Fleisch 2) connected to the model orifices. During nasal breathing: thermocouple amplitude = 0.38 Ln [pneumotachograph amplitude] + 1.31 and pressure cannula amplitude = 0.93 [pneumotachograph amplitude](2.15); during oral breathing: thermocouple amplitude = 0.44 Ln [pneumotachograph amplitude] + 1.07 and pressure cannula amplitude = 0.33 [pneumotachograph amplitude](1.72); (all range ∼ 0.1-∼ 4.0 L s(-1); r(2) > 0.7). For pneumotachograph amplitudes <1 L s(-1) (linear model) change in thermocouple amplitude/unit change in pneumotachograph amplitude was similar for nasal and oral airflow, whereas nasal pressure cannula amplitude/unit change in pneumotachograph amplitude was almost four times that for oral. Increasing oral orifice area from 0.33 cm(2) to 2.15 cm(2) increased oral thermocouple amplitude/unit change in pneumotachograph amplitude by ∼ 58% but decreased pressure cannula amplitude/unit change in pneumotachograph amplitude by 49%. For pneumotachograph amplitudes up to 1 L s(-1), alterations in inspiratory/expiratory ratios or total respiratory time did not affect the sensitivity of either nasal or oral pressure cannulae or the nasal thermocouple, but the oral thermocouple sensitivity was influenced by respiratory cycle time. Different nasal and oral responses influence the ability of these systems to quantitatively assess nasal and oral airflow and oro-nasal airflow partitioning.