Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics · 2009
First molar radicular bone near the maxillary sinus: a comparison of CBCT analysis and gross anatomic dissection for small bony measurement.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Howe Robert B
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study assessed agreement of cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) measurements against those obtained by gross dissection and physical calipers for dimensions of maxillary bone around first molar roots in cadaveric specimens.
STUDY DESIGN: A total of 37 human maxilla pairs with 69 first molars were analyzed by CBCT with a resolution of 200 microm and the results compared with gross dissection. Matched data sets of 414 data points (6 data points per tooth) were compared using Bland-Altman statistics. An operational definition of clinical accuracy was proposed.
RESULTS: The data sets displayed a Pearson correlation coefficient of r = 0.85. Analysis revealed a positive bias for CBCT of 0.4 mm with a standard deviation of 1.1 mm relative to gross dissection. Less bone around first molar roots was demonstrated than reported in available literature.
CONCLUSIONS: High-resolution CBCT measurements were acceptable for clinical accuracy and study of the maxillary sinus.
STUDY DESIGN: A total of 37 human maxilla pairs with 69 first molars were analyzed by CBCT with a resolution of 200 microm and the results compared with gross dissection. Matched data sets of 414 data points (6 data points per tooth) were compared using Bland-Altman statistics. An operational definition of clinical accuracy was proposed.
RESULTS: The data sets displayed a Pearson correlation coefficient of r = 0.85. Analysis revealed a positive bias for CBCT of 0.4 mm with a standard deviation of 1.1 mm relative to gross dissection. Less bone around first molar roots was demonstrated than reported in available literature.
CONCLUSIONS: High-resolution CBCT measurements were acceptable for clinical accuracy and study of the maxillary sinus.