The Journal of prosthetic dentistry · 2023
Three-dimensionally printed implant surgical guide-related experience, knowledge, attitude, and professional behaviors among 2028 dentists in China: A cross-sectional study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Muhetaer Aihemaiti, Yang Hongye, Liu Yan, Huang Cui
Аннотация
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Research on the current place of 3-dimensionally printed implant surgical guides (3D-ISGs) among practicing dentists worldwide is lacking, with little research focused on dentists' experience, knowledge, attitude, or professional behavior related to 3D-ISG or on the main obstacle to adoption.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to identify the adoption of 3D-ISG in dental practice in China and to determine factors that influence its further application and dentists' attitudes and willingness.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Semistructured questionnaires were sent to a sample of Chinese dentists composed of users and nonusers of 3D-ISG. The questionnaires were displayed and distributed through a professional online survey system (http://www.wjx.cn) and a social media platform (WeChat). The responses were analyzed with multivariable generalized equations, and the effect of various demographic variables was determined, including dentist experience, academic degree, and type of practice (public or private).
RESULTS: A total of 2028 valid questionnaires were collected. In dental practice, 39.3% of the respondents used 3D-ISG. Respondents with a PhD (62.4%) used the 3D-ISG more than twice as frequently as respondents with a junior college degree or below (31.8%). The majority of the members of implantology departments (81.7%) applied 3D-ISG, but doctors in other departments used it at a rate of less than half. The 3D-ISG was most frequently used in the maxillary anterior area (78.4%), followed by the edentulous maxilla and mandible (61.0% and 60.5%, respectively). The main barriers were high initial cost, complex and time-consuming digital design, and lack of expertise in the proper use of 3D-ISG.
CONCLUSIONS: Most dentists did not use 3D-ISG in dental practice. The 3D-ISG application rate was significantly associated with sex, academic degree, years of dental practice, department, monthly income, and type of healthcare facility. To improve the popularity of 3D-ISG, particularly among dentists without advanced degrees, it would be important to optimize the digital design software program and provide sufficient training.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to identify the adoption of 3D-ISG in dental practice in China and to determine factors that influence its further application and dentists' attitudes and willingness.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Semistructured questionnaires were sent to a sample of Chinese dentists composed of users and nonusers of 3D-ISG. The questionnaires were displayed and distributed through a professional online survey system (http://www.wjx.cn) and a social media platform (WeChat). The responses were analyzed with multivariable generalized equations, and the effect of various demographic variables was determined, including dentist experience, academic degree, and type of practice (public or private).
RESULTS: A total of 2028 valid questionnaires were collected. In dental practice, 39.3% of the respondents used 3D-ISG. Respondents with a PhD (62.4%) used the 3D-ISG more than twice as frequently as respondents with a junior college degree or below (31.8%). The majority of the members of implantology departments (81.7%) applied 3D-ISG, but doctors in other departments used it at a rate of less than half. The 3D-ISG was most frequently used in the maxillary anterior area (78.4%), followed by the edentulous maxilla and mandible (61.0% and 60.5%, respectively). The main barriers were high initial cost, complex and time-consuming digital design, and lack of expertise in the proper use of 3D-ISG.
CONCLUSIONS: Most dentists did not use 3D-ISG in dental practice. The 3D-ISG application rate was significantly associated with sex, academic degree, years of dental practice, department, monthly income, and type of healthcare facility. To improve the popularity of 3D-ISG, particularly among dentists without advanced degrees, it would be important to optimize the digital design software program and provide sufficient training.