DOI 10.1097/scs.0000000000009105
Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence Study of Masseter Muscle Segmentation in Patients With Hemifacial Microsomia.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Hemifacial microsomia (HFM) is one of the most common congenital craniofacial condition often accompanied by masseter muscle involvement. U-Net neural convolution network for masseter segmentation is expected to achieve an efficient evaluation of masseter muscle.
METHODS
A database was established with 108 patients with HFM from June 2012 to June 2019 in our center. Demographic data, OMENS classification, and 1-mm layer thick 3-dimensional computed tomography were included. Two radiologists manually segmented masseter muscles in a consensus reading as the ground truth. A test set of 20 cases was duplicated into 2 groups: an experimental group with the intelligent algorithm and a control group with manual segmentation. The U-net follows the design of 3D RoI-Aware U-Net with overlapping window strategy and references to our previous study of masseter segmentation in a healthy population system. Sorensen dice-similarity coefficient (DSC) muscle volume, average surface distance, recall, and time were used to validate compared with the ground truth.
RESULTS
The mean DSC value of 0.794±0.028 for the experiment group was compared with the manual segmentation (0.885±0.118) with α=0.05 and a noninferiority margin of 15%. In addition, higher DSC was reported in patients with milder mandible deformity ( r =0.824, P <0.05). Moreover, intelligent automatic segmentation takes only 6.4 seconds showing great efficiency.
CONCLUSIONS
We first proposed a U-net neural convolutional network and achieved automatic segmentation of masseter muscles in patients with HFM. It is a great attempt at intelligent diagnosis and evaluation of craniofacial diseases.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.