Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2010
Augmentation mentoplasty with osteocartilaginous nasal graft.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cingi Cemal, Songu Murat, Thomas J Regan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Augmentation mentoplasty is a common procedure, applied especially in conjunction with rhinoplasty. Although various materials have been used, autogenous nasal hump tissue has not been studied in a big series of patients. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the use of autogenous nasal hump in chin augmentation.
STUDY DESIGN: Case series with chart review.
SETTING: University hospital.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The osteocartilaginous mentoplasty procedure was performed in 124 patients along with rhinoplasty in a series of 218 patients who had undergone combined rhinoplasty and mentoplasty with various techniques. The median follow-up was 58 months (range, 12-120 months) over a 10-year period. The procedure commenced under general anesthesia for all patients with large humps and poor chin projection. During the rhinoplasty procedure, the osteocartilaginous nasal hump was removed, tailored to achieve an anatomic mental form, and inserted into the mental pocket through a submental or an intraoral incision.
RESULTS: Infection was detected in five patients, two of whom required graft removal. All other patients recovered normally along an almost painless process, without displacements or any other complaints.
CONCLUSION: Nasal hump in reduction rhinoplasty is a useful alternative for augmentation mentoplasty on patients with large humps and poor chin projection. It also avoids all the disadvantages of alloplastic materials and eases integration compared with other alternatives in selected cases.
STUDY DESIGN: Case series with chart review.
SETTING: University hospital.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The osteocartilaginous mentoplasty procedure was performed in 124 patients along with rhinoplasty in a series of 218 patients who had undergone combined rhinoplasty and mentoplasty with various techniques. The median follow-up was 58 months (range, 12-120 months) over a 10-year period. The procedure commenced under general anesthesia for all patients with large humps and poor chin projection. During the rhinoplasty procedure, the osteocartilaginous nasal hump was removed, tailored to achieve an anatomic mental form, and inserted into the mental pocket through a submental or an intraoral incision.
RESULTS: Infection was detected in five patients, two of whom required graft removal. All other patients recovered normally along an almost painless process, without displacements or any other complaints.
CONCLUSION: Nasal hump in reduction rhinoplasty is a useful alternative for augmentation mentoplasty on patients with large humps and poor chin projection. It also avoids all the disadvantages of alloplastic materials and eases integration compared with other alternatives in selected cases.