Surgery · 2003
Increased PDX-1 expression is associated with outcome in patients with pancreatic cancer.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Koizumi Masayuki, Doi Ryuichiro, Toyoda Eiji, Masui Toshihiko, Tulachan Sidhartha S, Kawaguchi Yoshiya, Fujimoto Koji, Gittes George K, Imamura Masayuki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: During pancreatic development, pancreatic duodenal homeobox gene-1 (PDX-1) is expressed in pancreatic duct cells that have the potential to differentiate into islets. Therefore, PDX-1 is thought to be a marker of de-differentiated cells with the capacity to redifferentiate into several pancreatic cell types. We analyzed PDX-1 expression in human pancreatic cancer specimens, pancreatic cancer cell lines, and the effects of forced expression of PDX-1 in pancreatic cancer cells.
METHODS: Thirty-five pancreatic adenocarcinomas were immunohistochemically stained with a polyclonal rabbit antibody against mouse PDX-1. Correlations with tumor characteristics were made with chi-squared analysis. The influence of clinicopathologic factors on survival was assessed. The expression of PDX-1 in pancreatic cancer cells was examined. Replication-deficient recombinant adenoviruses were constructed by the cosmid-adenoviral DNA terminal protein complex method. PANC-1 cells were infected with Ad-pdx-1 or Ad-LacZ. PANC-1 cells that were infected with adenovirus were used in a cell growth assay and a migration assay and for morphologic analysis.
RESULTS: Interestingly, 43% of pancreatic cancers were positive for PDX-1 expression, and 57% of pancreatic cancers were negative (normal pancreatic exocrine tissue shows little or no staining for PDX-1). Lymph node metastasis (P =.02) and histologic grade (P =.04) were correlated significantly with PDX-1 expression. Patients with positive PDX-1 had a significantly worse prognosis than those patients with negative PDX-1 (P =.02). Importantly, PDX-1 was an independent variable that effected overall survival (P =.03). Pancreatic cancer cell lines showed no PDX-1 expression. There were no significant differences in cell proliferation or morphologic condition between Ad-pdx-1- and Ad-lacZ-infected PANC-1 cells. However, Ad-pdx-1-infected PANC-1 cells did show a significantly higher migration rate than Ad-lacZ-infected PANC-1 cells.
CONCLUSIONS: Re-expression of PDX-1 may represent a return to a more de-differentiated state by more aggressive pancreatic cancers and may also represent an important new tumor marker for these aggressive cancers.
METHODS: Thirty-five pancreatic adenocarcinomas were immunohistochemically stained with a polyclonal rabbit antibody against mouse PDX-1. Correlations with tumor characteristics were made with chi-squared analysis. The influence of clinicopathologic factors on survival was assessed. The expression of PDX-1 in pancreatic cancer cells was examined. Replication-deficient recombinant adenoviruses were constructed by the cosmid-adenoviral DNA terminal protein complex method. PANC-1 cells were infected with Ad-pdx-1 or Ad-LacZ. PANC-1 cells that were infected with adenovirus were used in a cell growth assay and a migration assay and for morphologic analysis.
RESULTS: Interestingly, 43% of pancreatic cancers were positive for PDX-1 expression, and 57% of pancreatic cancers were negative (normal pancreatic exocrine tissue shows little or no staining for PDX-1). Lymph node metastasis (P =.02) and histologic grade (P =.04) were correlated significantly with PDX-1 expression. Patients with positive PDX-1 had a significantly worse prognosis than those patients with negative PDX-1 (P =.02). Importantly, PDX-1 was an independent variable that effected overall survival (P =.03). Pancreatic cancer cell lines showed no PDX-1 expression. There were no significant differences in cell proliferation or morphologic condition between Ad-pdx-1- and Ad-lacZ-infected PANC-1 cells. However, Ad-pdx-1-infected PANC-1 cells did show a significantly higher migration rate than Ad-lacZ-infected PANC-1 cells.
CONCLUSIONS: Re-expression of PDX-1 may represent a return to a more de-differentiated state by more aggressive pancreatic cancers and may also represent an important new tumor marker for these aggressive cancers.