Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2023
Research on a novel digital tooth sectioning guide system for tooth sectioning during mandibular third molar extraction: An in vitro study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zeng Jun, Jiang Ye, Liu Yudong, Hu Yongxin, Guo Chenmiao, Zhou Libin
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To construct a novel portable tooth sectioning guide to improve the accuracy of mandibular third molar extraction.
METHODS: First, 72 samples of an identical 3D-printed double-rooted mandibular third molar were obtained and used in 36 mandibular models. Three different models were constructed (class B vertical, mesial, and horizontal impaction). Then, we made the tooth sectioning guides. mimicking clinical tooth sectioning conditions, two dental surgeons with different levels of experience used both the digital guided technique and the traditional empirical technique during surgery. Accuracy indicators, including apical deviation and angle deviation, were analyzed and compared on postoperative cone-beam computed tomographic scanning and via image reconstruction. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed. A p-value of 0.05 indicated statistically significant differences among the groups.
RESULTS: Overall, the mean apical deviation of experienced/inexperienced operators using the conventional section technique was 1.120 mm (0.7 mm, 2.3 mm) and 1.54± 0.84 mm, respectively. Correspondingly, the mean apical deviation under the guided section technique was 0.28 mm (0.2 mm, 0.4 mm) and 0.32±0.16 mm, respectively. The mean angle deviations of experienced/inexperienced operators under the conventional section technique were 8.015° (3.5°, 10.5°) and 6.570° (5.5°, 14.9°). Correspondingly, the mean apical deviation using the guided section technique was 1.880° (0.4°, 2.9°) and 1.470° (0.7°, 3.1°), respectively. The conventional and guided techniques were significantly different (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In the digital guide technique, sectioning is more predictable and accurate, and the success of the operation is achievable with different proficiencies among dental surgeons.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This technique will not only reduce the difficulty of tooth extraction but also reduce the risk of damage to the surrounding soft and hard tissues, especially damage to the inferior alveolar nerve.
METHODS: First, 72 samples of an identical 3D-printed double-rooted mandibular third molar were obtained and used in 36 mandibular models. Three different models were constructed (class B vertical, mesial, and horizontal impaction). Then, we made the tooth sectioning guides. mimicking clinical tooth sectioning conditions, two dental surgeons with different levels of experience used both the digital guided technique and the traditional empirical technique during surgery. Accuracy indicators, including apical deviation and angle deviation, were analyzed and compared on postoperative cone-beam computed tomographic scanning and via image reconstruction. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed. A p-value of 0.05 indicated statistically significant differences among the groups.
RESULTS: Overall, the mean apical deviation of experienced/inexperienced operators using the conventional section technique was 1.120 mm (0.7 mm, 2.3 mm) and 1.54± 0.84 mm, respectively. Correspondingly, the mean apical deviation under the guided section technique was 0.28 mm (0.2 mm, 0.4 mm) and 0.32±0.16 mm, respectively. The mean angle deviations of experienced/inexperienced operators under the conventional section technique were 8.015° (3.5°, 10.5°) and 6.570° (5.5°, 14.9°). Correspondingly, the mean apical deviation using the guided section technique was 1.880° (0.4°, 2.9°) and 1.470° (0.7°, 3.1°), respectively. The conventional and guided techniques were significantly different (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In the digital guide technique, sectioning is more predictable and accurate, and the success of the operation is achievable with different proficiencies among dental surgeons.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This technique will not only reduce the difficulty of tooth extraction but also reduce the risk of damage to the surrounding soft and hard tissues, especially damage to the inferior alveolar nerve.