The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists · 1995
Laparoscopic-assisted tubal anastomosis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Frishman G N, Seifer D B
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the length of procedure, length of hospital stay, complications, and postoperative pregnancy rates of traditional tubal anastomosis (TA) and laparoscopic-assisted TA (LATA).
DESIGN: A comparison of 8 women undergoing LATA with 11 patients operated on by the same surgeon during a similar time period who were not candidates for, or did not desire, a laparoscopic approach.
SETTING: Academic practice tertiary care setting.
PATIENTS: Women requesting reversal of tubal ligation.
INTERVENTIONS: Tubal anastomosis by laparoscopy or laparotomy.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients undergoing the two procedures did not differ by age or parity, although those selected for LATA had a lower body mass index (23.2 +/- 1.4 vs 30.8 +/- 2.0 kg/m2, p = 0.01). Although the LATA took longer (251 +/- 14 vs 194 +/- 10 min, p = 0.004), hospital stay was significantly shorter than for traditional TA (1.8 +/- 0.3 vs 3.0 +/- 0.1 days, p = 0.004). Of the eight LATAs, six were completed and two were converted to laparotomy. For all patients with follow-up, clinical pregnancy rates were 43% and 29% (NS) for TA and LATA, respectively, with 100% of the former and 80% (NS) of the latter group who did not conceive having at least one patent tube on hysterosalpingogram.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic-assisted TA is a possible alternative to the traditional TA performed by laparotomy. Ideal candidates for LATA appear to be women without obesity and with proximal tubal segments of 3 cm or greater. Larger studies with longer follow-up will define appropriate candidates and identify long-term results.
DESIGN: A comparison of 8 women undergoing LATA with 11 patients operated on by the same surgeon during a similar time period who were not candidates for, or did not desire, a laparoscopic approach.
SETTING: Academic practice tertiary care setting.
PATIENTS: Women requesting reversal of tubal ligation.
INTERVENTIONS: Tubal anastomosis by laparoscopy or laparotomy.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients undergoing the two procedures did not differ by age or parity, although those selected for LATA had a lower body mass index (23.2 +/- 1.4 vs 30.8 +/- 2.0 kg/m2, p = 0.01). Although the LATA took longer (251 +/- 14 vs 194 +/- 10 min, p = 0.004), hospital stay was significantly shorter than for traditional TA (1.8 +/- 0.3 vs 3.0 +/- 0.1 days, p = 0.004). Of the eight LATAs, six were completed and two were converted to laparotomy. For all patients with follow-up, clinical pregnancy rates were 43% and 29% (NS) for TA and LATA, respectively, with 100% of the former and 80% (NS) of the latter group who did not conceive having at least one patent tube on hysterosalpingogram.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic-assisted TA is a possible alternative to the traditional TA performed by laparotomy. Ideal candidates for LATA appear to be women without obesity and with proximal tubal segments of 3 cm or greater. Larger studies with longer follow-up will define appropriate candidates and identify long-term results.