Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2014
Predicting postsurgery nasal physiology with computational modeling: current challenges and limitations.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Frank-Ito Dennis O, Kimbell Julia S, Laud Purushottam, Garcia Guilherme J M, Rhee John S
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: High failure rates for surgical treatment of nasal airway obstruction (NAO) indicate that better diagnostic tools are needed to improve surgical planning. This study evaluates whether computer models based on a surgeon's edits of presurgery scans can accurately predict results from computer models based on postoperative scans of the same patient using computational fluid dynamics.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: Academic medical center.
METHODS: Three-dimensional nasal models were reconstructed from computed tomographic scans of 10 patients with NAO presurgery and 5 to 8 months postsurgery. To create transcribed-surgery models, the surgeon digitally modified the preoperative reconstruction in each patient to represent physical changes expected from surgery and healing. Steady-state, laminar, inspiratory airflow was simulated in each model under physiologic, pressure-driven conditions.
RESULTS: Transcribed-surgery and postsurgery model variables were statistically different from presurgery variables at α = 0.05. Unilateral nasal resistance and airflow were not statistically different between transcribed-surgery and postsurgery models, but bilateral resistance was significantly different. Cross-sectional average pressures in transcribed surgery trended with postsurgery. Transcribed-surgery prediction errors of postsurgery bilateral resistance were within 10% to 20% and 20% to 30% in 5 and 4 subjects, respectively. Prediction errors for unilateral resistance were <10%, 10% to 20%, and 20% to 30% in 1, 2, and 4 subjects, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Computational models with modifications mimicking actual surgery and healing have the potential to predict postoperative outcomes. However, software to effectively translate virtual surgery steps into computational models is lacking. The ability to account for healing factors and the current limited virtual surgery tools are challenges that need to be overcome for greater accuracy.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: Academic medical center.
METHODS: Three-dimensional nasal models were reconstructed from computed tomographic scans of 10 patients with NAO presurgery and 5 to 8 months postsurgery. To create transcribed-surgery models, the surgeon digitally modified the preoperative reconstruction in each patient to represent physical changes expected from surgery and healing. Steady-state, laminar, inspiratory airflow was simulated in each model under physiologic, pressure-driven conditions.
RESULTS: Transcribed-surgery and postsurgery model variables were statistically different from presurgery variables at α = 0.05. Unilateral nasal resistance and airflow were not statistically different between transcribed-surgery and postsurgery models, but bilateral resistance was significantly different. Cross-sectional average pressures in transcribed surgery trended with postsurgery. Transcribed-surgery prediction errors of postsurgery bilateral resistance were within 10% to 20% and 20% to 30% in 5 and 4 subjects, respectively. Prediction errors for unilateral resistance were <10%, 10% to 20%, and 20% to 30% in 1, 2, and 4 subjects, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Computational models with modifications mimicking actual surgery and healing have the potential to predict postoperative outcomes. However, software to effectively translate virtual surgery steps into computational models is lacking. The ability to account for healing factors and the current limited virtual surgery tools are challenges that need to be overcome for greater accuracy.