International journal of colorectal disease · 2023
Development of novel prediction models for nodal and distant metastasis in G1 and G2 colorectal neuroendocrine tumors.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Zhijie, Liu Qian
Аннотация
PURPOSE: We aimed to construct novel nomograms for nodal and distant metastasis for patients with G1 and G2 colorectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).
METHODS: A training set and validation set were obtained by including G1 and G2 colorectal NET patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and the Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Science, respectively. The area under curve (AUC) values under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and the Hosmer‒Lemeshow tests were used to evaluate the discriminability and calibration of nomograms.
RESULTS: In total, 3690 and 172 patients were included in the training set and validation set, respectively. Tumor size, location, and T stage were included in the nomogram predicting nodal metastasis. The AUC values of the nomogram were 0.972 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.964-0.980) and 0.897 (95% CI: 0.846-0.948) in the training set and validation set, respectively. The calibration plots and Hosmer‒Lemeshow test for the training set (P = 0.999) and validation set (P = 0.537) showed good model calibration. Tumor size, T stage, and N stage were incorporated into the nomogram predicting distant metastasis. The ROC curves demonstrated desirable discrimination both in the training set (AUC = 0.938 (95% CI: 0.921-0.954)) and validation set (AUC = 0.938 (95% CI: 0.890-0.988)). The calibration curves and Hosmer‒Lemeshow test indicated acceptable model calibration both in the training set (P = 0.908) and validation set (P = 0.722).
CONCLUSION: The proposed nomograms may be used as a reliable tool to predict the nodal and distant metastasis in G1 and G2 colorectal NETs.
METHODS: A training set and validation set were obtained by including G1 and G2 colorectal NET patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and the Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Science, respectively. The area under curve (AUC) values under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and the Hosmer‒Lemeshow tests were used to evaluate the discriminability and calibration of nomograms.
RESULTS: In total, 3690 and 172 patients were included in the training set and validation set, respectively. Tumor size, location, and T stage were included in the nomogram predicting nodal metastasis. The AUC values of the nomogram were 0.972 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.964-0.980) and 0.897 (95% CI: 0.846-0.948) in the training set and validation set, respectively. The calibration plots and Hosmer‒Lemeshow test for the training set (P = 0.999) and validation set (P = 0.537) showed good model calibration. Tumor size, T stage, and N stage were incorporated into the nomogram predicting distant metastasis. The ROC curves demonstrated desirable discrimination both in the training set (AUC = 0.938 (95% CI: 0.921-0.954)) and validation set (AUC = 0.938 (95% CI: 0.890-0.988)). The calibration curves and Hosmer‒Lemeshow test indicated acceptable model calibration both in the training set (P = 0.908) and validation set (P = 0.722).
CONCLUSION: The proposed nomograms may be used as a reliable tool to predict the nodal and distant metastasis in G1 and G2 colorectal NETs.