MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.62347/cijg3615

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of cancer research · 2025

Robotic vs laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the impact of surgeon volume on surgical margins and quality of life.

Zhang Zhi-Feng, Li Shi-Bin, Ji Yang

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The principal established therapeutic option for localized prostate cancer is the robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) over the laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Robust data from Chinese hospitals is limited, and the effect of surgeon experience is often overlooked.

OBJECTIVE

This study retrospectively compares outcomes between RARP and LRP, evaluating the impact of surgeon experience.

METHODS

The clinical information of 252 patients who underwent RARP or LRP between 2019 and 2023 was retrospectively analysed. Multivariable regression models, for both patient characteristics and surgeon volume, were employed to evaluate perioperative metrics, complications, positive surgical margins (PSM), continence, and patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

RARP demonstrated superior advantages, including a shorter operative time (154.9±28.3 vs. 169.2±23.9 minutes, P<0.001), less blood loss (172.5±56.8 vs. 306.8±82.2 mL, P<0.001), and a shorter hospital stay (2.3 vs. 3.9 days, P<0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that both surgical approaches and surgeon volume were predictors of outcomes: 66% lower odds of PSM (OR: 0.34, P=0.009) in the RARP group, while high-volume surgeons demonstrated 96% lower odds of PSM compared to low-volume surgeons (OR: 0.039, P<0.001). RARP patients experienced fewer complications (25.4% vs. 39.7%, P=0.016) and a higher continence recovery at 12 months (95.2% vs. 80.2%, P=0.001). Regarding patient-reported outcomes, RARP was consistently favored across all domains (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

While preserving comparable functional and short-period cancer-related outcomes, RARP outperformed LRP in perioperative outcomes and patients' quality of life. These findings demonstrate that both surgical technology and surgeon volume are critical, independent determinants of surgical quality. The optimal outcomes are achieved by pairing advanced robotic technology with high-volume surgical expertise.

Для цитирования: Zhang Zhi-Feng, Li Shi-Bin, Ji Yang. Robotic vs laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the impact of surgeon volume on surgical margins and quality of life.. American journal of cancer research. 2025. DOI: 10.62347/cijg3615.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.