MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0030-6657(08)70240-3

Медицинская библиотека · Otolaryngologia polska = The Polish otolaryngology · 2008

[A case of giant pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland].

Grabowski Leszek, Kołodziejczyk Andrzej, Burzej-Uchto Małgorzata

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

A case of pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland was reported. Pleomorphic adenoma is the most common benign tumor of the major salivary glands. A review of the literature confirms that this kind of tumor is less common in the minor salivary glands. We described statistic population, types of the diagnostic, treatment and clinical course of pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland.

MATERIAL AND METHOD: We encountered such a tumor in a 55-year-old woman who was admitted to our Hospital. The only symptom was significant face deformation, growing for 30 years.

RESULTS

The tumor was located under the right side of the face and was removed surgically. No complications were observed in the postoperative course but paresis of the facial nerve occurred. The patient was discharged from the hospital with the recommendation of facial muscles rehabilitation. After the two months from the surgery, paresis was diminished. Afterwards contact with the patient got lost.

CONCLUSION

Pleomorphic adenoma is the most common benign tumor of the major salivary glands. Surgery is the main method of the treatment. The most common complication is paresis of the facial nerve.

Для цитирования: Grabowski Leszek, Kołodziejczyk Andrzej, Burzej-Uchto Małgorzata. [A case of giant pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland].. Otolaryngologia polska = The Polish otolaryngology. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/s0030-6657(08)70240-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.