World journal of urology · 2015
Significance of second transurethral resection on patient outcomes in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients treated with bladder-preserving multimodal therapy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Suer Evren, Hamidi Nurullah, Gokce Mehmet Ilker, Gulpinar Omer, Turkolmez Kadir, Beduk Yasar, Baltaci Sumer
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Although the role of second transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURB) is well established in high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, to the best of our knowledge, there is no study regarding the role of a second transurethral resection (TUR) after a complete first TURB in multimodal therapy (MMT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of a second TUR on disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) rates in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients who were treated with MMT.
METHODS: We assessed the data of 90 patients (stage T2-4, N0-1, M0 urothelial cancer) who were treated with MMT at our clinic between January 2000 and June 2014. Patients with incomplete initial TURB were excluded. A total of 43 patients had a second TUR before starting radiochemotherapy of MMT (group 1), and 47 patients (group 2) were treated with MMT without having a second TUR. The impact of second TUR on DSS and OS rates was the primary outcome measure of the study.
RESULTS: Mean (SD, range) age and mean follow-up of the patients were 65.1 (7.1, 52-81) years and 60.3 (38.3, 6-159) months, respectively. The two groups were similar with regard to sex, age, presence of hydronephrosis, lymph node involvement and stage. The 5-year DSS rate was better in group 1 compared to group 2 (68 vs. 41 %) (p = 0.046). The 5-year OS rates of the patients were 63.7 and 40.1 % in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.054). Multivariate analysis revealed that second TUR, lymph node involvement, presence of hydronephrosis and tumor stage were independent prognostic factors for DSS.
CONCLUSIONS: Second TUR should be performed in patients with MIBC who are going to be treated with bladder-preserving MMT protocols.
METHODS: We assessed the data of 90 patients (stage T2-4, N0-1, M0 urothelial cancer) who were treated with MMT at our clinic between January 2000 and June 2014. Patients with incomplete initial TURB were excluded. A total of 43 patients had a second TUR before starting radiochemotherapy of MMT (group 1), and 47 patients (group 2) were treated with MMT without having a second TUR. The impact of second TUR on DSS and OS rates was the primary outcome measure of the study.
RESULTS: Mean (SD, range) age and mean follow-up of the patients were 65.1 (7.1, 52-81) years and 60.3 (38.3, 6-159) months, respectively. The two groups were similar with regard to sex, age, presence of hydronephrosis, lymph node involvement and stage. The 5-year DSS rate was better in group 1 compared to group 2 (68 vs. 41 %) (p = 0.046). The 5-year OS rates of the patients were 63.7 and 40.1 % in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.054). Multivariate analysis revealed that second TUR, lymph node involvement, presence of hydronephrosis and tumor stage were independent prognostic factors for DSS.
CONCLUSIONS: Second TUR should be performed in patients with MIBC who are going to be treated with bladder-preserving MMT protocols.