European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2014
Comparison of morcellator and culdotomy for extraction of uterine fibroids laparoscopically.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Chin-Jung, Lee Jiah Min, Yu Hsing-Tse, Huang Chen-Ying, Chin Hung-Yen, Wang Shih-Ming
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To define a rational guideline for the removal of uterine fibroids after laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) by culdotomy or morcellator in multiparae.
STUDY DESIGN: A total of 416 multiparae receiving LM were retrospectively studied between November 1997 and January 2014. Of these, 335 had fibroids removed by culdotomy and 81 by a laparoscopic 15mm electromechanical morcellator. Data on parity, number, size and weight of fibroids, operating time, specimen removal time, blood loss, postoperative stay, hospital charges and complications were recorded. The patients were analyzed in four subgroups stratified by main fibroid size and type of procedure.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in body mass index, number of fibroids removed, blood loss, complications, and hospitalization duration between the groups. For fibroids below 10cm, the morcellator was significantly faster compared to culdotomy (10min versus 12min, p<0.001). For fibroids 10cm and above, there was no significant difference in time by culdotomy compared to morcellator (24min versus 20min, p=0.497). The electromechanical morcellator was significantly more expensive.
CONCLUSION: Fibroid size of 10cm may be used as a guide for the route of fibroid removal; below 10cm the morcellator is faster but more expensive, for fibroids 10cm and above, culdotomy can be considered as it has a similar removal time to the morcellator in multiparae.
STUDY DESIGN: A total of 416 multiparae receiving LM were retrospectively studied between November 1997 and January 2014. Of these, 335 had fibroids removed by culdotomy and 81 by a laparoscopic 15mm electromechanical morcellator. Data on parity, number, size and weight of fibroids, operating time, specimen removal time, blood loss, postoperative stay, hospital charges and complications were recorded. The patients were analyzed in four subgroups stratified by main fibroid size and type of procedure.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in body mass index, number of fibroids removed, blood loss, complications, and hospitalization duration between the groups. For fibroids below 10cm, the morcellator was significantly faster compared to culdotomy (10min versus 12min, p<0.001). For fibroids 10cm and above, there was no significant difference in time by culdotomy compared to morcellator (24min versus 20min, p=0.497). The electromechanical morcellator was significantly more expensive.
CONCLUSION: Fibroid size of 10cm may be used as a guide for the route of fibroid removal; below 10cm the morcellator is faster but more expensive, for fibroids 10cm and above, culdotomy can be considered as it has a similar removal time to the morcellator in multiparae.