Real-World Treatment Outcomes of Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy in Asians.

PURPOSE: To describe the 12-month outcomes of treatment-naïve eyes with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) resulting from age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) after initiation of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monotherapy or combination therapy with verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT).

DESIGN

A 12-month single-center, retrospective, comparative, nonrandomized cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with AMD or PCV who initiated intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy during 2015.

METHODS

Demographics, visual outcomes, OCT, and treatment data were collected at baseline and months 1, 3, 6, and 12 after treatment initiation. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify baseline features predictive of visual maintenance and improvement after 12 months of treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary end point was visual acuity (VA) change from baseline to month 12. Secondary end points were treatment exposure and change in central subfield thickness on OCT.

RESULTS

A total of 364 patients (165 AMD and 199 PCV) were included. Baseline vision was 41 and 43 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) letters for AMD and PCV patients, respectively. Patients with AMD and PCV received 5.5 and 5.3 injections (5.0 monotherapy vs. 5.6 combination therapy; mean, 1.2 PDT sessions), respectively. Patients with AMD gained 4.7 logMAR letters after 12 months (P = 0.002), whereas PCV patients gained 6.6 logMAR letters (P = 0.001) and 10.8 logMAR letters (P < 0.001) for monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively. Only patients with presenting VA of fewer than 35 letters (Snellen equivalent, 6/60) achieved significant visual improvement (10.4 letters for AMD, 17.1 letters for PCV with monotherapy, and 35.5 letters for PCV with combination therapy). Predictors of VA gain included number of intravitreal injections (AMD and PCV adjusted odds ratio, 12.1 [P = 0.001] and 12.5 [P = 0.004] for ≥7 injections, respectively) and baseline VA of 20 logMAR letters or fewer (adjusted odds ratio, 3.8 and 10.6 for AMD and PCV, respectively). Age, gender, race, use of PDT or focal laser therapy, and central subfield thickness were not predictive of significant visual gain at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In Asian patients, treatment of AMD with anti-VEGF therapy yielded 12-month visual outcomes comparable with those of other real-world studies from Western populations but poorer than those of controlled trials. In contrast, for PCV eyes, anti-VEGF monotherapy and combination therapy with PDT yielded comparable outcomes as those of controlled clinical trials.