Two-dimensional (2D) placental ultrasound measurements - The correlation with placental volume measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

INTRODUCTION

Information about placental size in ongoing pregnancies may aid the identification of pregnancies with increased risk of adverse outcome. Placental volume can be measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, this method is not universally available in antenatal care. Ultrasound is the diagnostic tool of choice in pregnancy. Therefore, we studied whether simple two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound placental measurements were correlated with placental volume measured by MRI.

METHODS

We examined a convenience sample of 104 ongoing pregnancies at gestational week 27, using both ultrasound and MRI. The ultrasound measurements included placental length, width and thickness. Placental volume was measured using MRI. The correlation between each 2D placental ultrasound measurement and placental volume was estimated by applying Pearson's correlation coefficient (r).

RESULTS

Mean placental length was 17.2 cm (SD 2.1 cm), mean width was 14.7 cm (SD 2.1 cm), and mean thickness was 3.2 cm (SD 0.6 cm). Mean placental volume was 536 cm3 (SD 137 cm3). The 2D ultrasound measurements showed poor correlation with placental volume (placental length; r = 0.27, width; r = 0.37, and thickness r = 0.13).

DISCUSSION: Simple 2D ultrasound measurements of the placenta were poorly correlated with placental volume and cannot be used as proximate measures of placental volume. Our finding may be explained by the large variation between pregnancies in intrauterine placental shape.