Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2019
Retinal and Choroidal Perfusion Status in the Area of Laser Scars Assessed With Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Karst Sonja G, Beiglboeck Hannes, Scharinger Raffael, Meyer Elias L, Mitsch Christoph, Scholda Christoph, Schmidt-Erfurth Ursula M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the perfusion status of the retina and choriocapillaris in the area of laser scars on swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images of eyes previously treated with panretinal photocoagulation (PRP).
METHODS: Cross-sectional exploratory analysis of swept-source OCTA images, which were retrospectively reviewed for laser scars. The appearance of the capillary networks in the area of previous laser were evaluated following a three-step grading system (normal/sparse/missing capillary network). The superficial and deep capillary plexus of the retina and the choriocapillaris were graded separately.
RESULTS: A total of 3140 laser scars in 54 eyes of 31 patients (13 female, mean age 57 ± 12 years) were included in this analysis. In the retina, 6.8% of the superficial and deep capillary network in the area evaluated appeared normal, 58% and 56% sparse, and 35% and 37% missing. Capillary dropout in the retina was not restricted to the area of prior laser treatment. The choriocapillaris decorrelation signal was either sparse (61%) or completely missing (38%) within the laser scar area. The perfusion of the choriocapillaris appeared normal in the area adjacent to laser scars.
CONCLUSIONS: Capillary non-perfusion in the choriocapillaris was found within the laser scar area. Laser treatment seems to cause sustained non-perfusion of choriocapillaris in the area treated.
METHODS: Cross-sectional exploratory analysis of swept-source OCTA images, which were retrospectively reviewed for laser scars. The appearance of the capillary networks in the area of previous laser were evaluated following a three-step grading system (normal/sparse/missing capillary network). The superficial and deep capillary plexus of the retina and the choriocapillaris were graded separately.
RESULTS: A total of 3140 laser scars in 54 eyes of 31 patients (13 female, mean age 57 ± 12 years) were included in this analysis. In the retina, 6.8% of the superficial and deep capillary network in the area evaluated appeared normal, 58% and 56% sparse, and 35% and 37% missing. Capillary dropout in the retina was not restricted to the area of prior laser treatment. The choriocapillaris decorrelation signal was either sparse (61%) or completely missing (38%) within the laser scar area. The perfusion of the choriocapillaris appeared normal in the area adjacent to laser scars.
CONCLUSIONS: Capillary non-perfusion in the choriocapillaris was found within the laser scar area. Laser treatment seems to cause sustained non-perfusion of choriocapillaris in the area treated.