Surgery today · 2015
Introduction of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (Dermabond®) for incisional hernia mesh repair.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Saito Yoshiyuki, Kubota Keisuke, Okada Akihiro, Deguchi Tomoaki, Kuroda Junko, Nitori Nobuhiro, Kadomura Tomohisa, Yoshida Masashi, Kitajima Masaki
Аннотация
PURPOSE: We developed a new technique, sutureless mesh fixation, using 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (Dermabond®, a surgical tissue adhesive) for incisional hernia repair. The objective of this article is to introduce the new technique and to examine whether the technique provides sufficient resistance to abdominal pressure.
METHODS: We conducted two tests using a porcine model, a traction experiment and artificial pneumoperitoneum test. In the traction experiment, the adherence properties of Dermabond® with mesh and peritoneum were examined using a tissue fragment from a pig. In the artificial pneumoperitoneum test, which used an incisional hernia porcine model, mesh was implanted on the peritoneum in the abdominal cavity with Dermabond®. It was then determined whether sutureless mesh fixation could bear artificial abdominal air pressure.
RESULTS: In the traction experiment, Dermabond®, which bonded the mesh to the peritoneum, tolerated pressure up to 2.45 × 103 mmHg. In the artificial pneumoperitoneum test, the mesh was strongly fastened to the peritoneum by means of only Dermabond®, and there was little air circulation even without closing the wound over the mesh.
CONCLUSIONS: Sutureless mesh fixation with Dermabond® is technically feasible and promises to provide sufficient resistance to abdominal pressure.
METHODS: We conducted two tests using a porcine model, a traction experiment and artificial pneumoperitoneum test. In the traction experiment, the adherence properties of Dermabond® with mesh and peritoneum were examined using a tissue fragment from a pig. In the artificial pneumoperitoneum test, which used an incisional hernia porcine model, mesh was implanted on the peritoneum in the abdominal cavity with Dermabond®. It was then determined whether sutureless mesh fixation could bear artificial abdominal air pressure.
RESULTS: In the traction experiment, Dermabond®, which bonded the mesh to the peritoneum, tolerated pressure up to 2.45 × 103 mmHg. In the artificial pneumoperitoneum test, the mesh was strongly fastened to the peritoneum by means of only Dermabond®, and there was little air circulation even without closing the wound over the mesh.
CONCLUSIONS: Sutureless mesh fixation with Dermabond® is technically feasible and promises to provide sufficient resistance to abdominal pressure.